This is true.
>Evidence is that it was a chemical explosion, non-nuclear.
-
It could not have been ammonium nitrate because when that blows up, the smoke is white. Correct answer: The smoke color from an ammonium nitrate blast is completely dependent on whatever was mixed with it to get it to explode. Additionally, if the freakishly impossible conditions are met to get it to explode without an oxidizer, you get nothing. The results are pathetic. Under those conditions (as stated in the MSM to be what happened) the smoke is white, not red. So it is partially correct, but not worth presenting. And you'd only meet those conditions with a pound or so under precise control, you'd never cause it to torch off that huge pile.
-
Here's a good one that might fool people: The cloud was water being thrown in the air, it was a harbor after all. Reality: It was not water or water vapor, it was distorted air turning opaque. water vapor would not just vanish in a second, what was actually seen was air distortions from a supersonic blast wave. And, to back that up, where is the harbor in this pic?
-
It was a weapons cache that exploded, not a nuke. Possible. But not likely, the precise shape of the fire ball and perfect shock wave is not very likely, and there's that pic above, this is not the first time. Israel was testing these in Syria and an oops happened, that picture got out. Surprisingly Sorcha posted that pic and that is where I saw it first. Subsequent searches turned up very little, Sorcha may have been given something. And if so, that's plenty of forgiveness for all those "rumors circulating the Kremlin". That picture is literally the holy grail, we now know damn well Israel is using nukes, perhaps a new type, and that is what went off in Beirut.
-
It was not a nuke because there would have been an enormous flash at first. Correction: Only air bursts make the enormous flash. This was not an air burst. This was either set off in the warehouse or in the tunnels under the warehouse. This was a bomb that got smuggled in, I doubt a missile could have hit so precisely there would be no enormous flash. If it was set up in the warehouse, the flash would have been gone before the shock wave blew the roof off. The fireball would still be there, and we have a nice pic of that.
-
The fire beforehand proves this is just an explosion, everyone is nuts for crying nuke. Reality: Ventriloquism is an old art, the fire was the puppet and the nuke was the voice. Israel is not stupid, (actually, they were stupid) because when they set up the diversion they got everyone's attention, including someone who was able to get a high class SLR set up to record the blast with nuclear test site quality. That's a major OOPS, I am sure Israel did not factor that into their equation. The fire ball says it all. It did not even originate in the right place but with typical cell phone cams, no one would have caught that.
-
If it was a nuke, the grain silo would have been completely vanished. Not so. During the Trinity tests, objects that were very solid were placed very near the blast, including a big steel ball, and on the steel ball there was still paint afterward. Lots of nearby stuff was not totally blown away. Additionally, in real life Hiroshima, sturdy structures, including a church only 700 feet from ground zero, stayed standing. That grain silo was beyond sturdy, it was very robust and had materials inside it (that are now scattered all over in front of it after they spilled out) that provided even more support. In reality, the extent of the damage to that grain silo proves it was a nuke, there was a substantial distance between it and the blast and it still got amazingly destroyed. The crater, which was 200 meters across, actually indicates a 100 kiloton blast, but I did not go into that.
jim stone
From that site you shill.