Why is the Baker promoting someone's proprietary site?
Is it a Baker who opened it?
Still it's very offensive.
I think these are the people who preach "love" "peace" all the time.
Is that how you get trust?
Its about using the brand.of this board which deliberately belongs to no on?
What do other's think
. Taking it off site and owning it and promoting it? using a position as Baker to promote it?
Weren't people here against that sort of thing in the past?
>>10484279 pb
thumbing their nose
at the Executive and DoJ
The judge whose husband is head of the ACLU should be looked into "Cornelia Pillard"
ACLU never does its job protecting individual rights. It's a sham and has been for years.
She's the one, Cornelia, who is highlighted with the oval below. She was noticeably angry at the first hearing (biased?) and twisted logic and law to the nth. Very autocratic.
And even sounded a bit unstable / nutty!
I pink-x-ed the smirkers. Hell of a lot of smirkers on this Panel
I want to look up who were the 2 dissenters. I'm guessing Wilkins, though just as a weak guess based upon the fact he's the only one who appears serious (fitting for a judge)
And none of the pink x's? or Cornelia were dissenters from the majority decision?