Anonymous ID: 7c5594 Sept. 1, 2020, 9:38 a.m. No.10493817   🗄️.is 🔗kun

 

>>10493721

Why did Mueller leave Carter Page alone?

Papadopoulos caught a wrap. Manafort, Stone, Flynn, Cohen and hell even Corsi got roughed up by Mueller. Not Page. Always found that weird. By his own admission, he's a CIA nigger, or a nigger asset, might he something to do with it.

 

Who sent him to the campaign?

Brennan?

Anonymous ID: 7c5594 Sept. 1, 2020, 9:48 a.m. No.10493907   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10493708

>safety precautions for WH tours

FLOTUS ain't talking about face masks and keeping six feet apart. She's talking about the ass beatings antifa are handing out as you enter and exit the White House.

Anonymous ID: 7c5594 Sept. 1, 2020, 10:15 a.m. No.10494133   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4143 >>4156 >>4177

>>10494051

Barr is a prosecutor. Prosecutors can't tell the judge what to do. Dems would sure like that, I'm sure. Barr did the next best thing he could, he dropped all charges. Sullivan is a mad man keeping a criminal proceeding going without a prosecutor, though.

 

As for President Trump and a pardon, first Flynn would have to be sentenced. Can't pardon a guy who hasn't been convicted of a crime. So for the moment Flynn is in purgatory, neither going to be convicted or freed. Some fucked up shit, but neither POTUS or Barr can do anything. This is now in the court's hands and the system has transformed into some Chinese Kangaroo Court proceeding.

Anonymous ID: 7c5594 Sept. 1, 2020, 10:42 a.m. No.10494390   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10494143

>>10494161

>>10494177

Alright. Looked it up. Though Nixon should of made it obvious to me. Sauce on Supreme Court decision that made ot official (had been done b4 ruling) the president could pardon you for shit you hadn't been convicted of:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-2/clause-1/effects-of-a-pardon-ex-parte-garland

 

Ex parte Garland, 71 U.S. 333 (1866)

 

The question before the Court was whether, armed with this pardon, Garland was entitled to practice in the federal courts despite the act of Congress just mentioned. Justice Field wrote for a divided Court: “[T]he inquiry arises as to the effect and operation of a pardon, and on this point all the authorities concur. A pardon reaches both the punishment prescribed for the offence and the guilt of the offender; and when the pardon is full, it releases the punishment and blots out of existence the guilt, so that in the eye of the law the offender is as innocent as if he had never committed the offence. If granted before conviction, it prevents any of the penalties and disabilities consequent upon conviction from attaching; if granted after conviction, it removes the penalties and disabilities, and restores him to all his civil rights; it makes him, as it were, a new man, and gives him a new credit and capacity.”