>>10546281 lb
>economic sabotage is def a DS tool whereby the rake in billions, Potus understands this better than anyone.
>>10546281 lb
>me thinks he has and will have treasury/esf intervene to knock out shorts.
Too funny while hypocritical at the same time, anon.
Naked shorts are 'sabotage,' treasury and/or Fed buying futures to turbo-inflate already historically super-inflated multiples is okay?
Your attitude is exactly what makes equity market levels so phony right now. It really doesn't matter because the debt on the other side of covid will be unsustainable, u.s. debt will become undesirable, interest rates will spike and it's game over for a decade or two for the u.s. economy.
The market may have simply responded to the Atlantic article. Maybe even due to some inside info on the existence of Potus on tape saying what was in the article.
cnbc tried to lay the sell-off (which didn't recover Friday as you incorrectly stated) off on 'Robinhood types' buying on margin instead of betting on games and margin calls.
aapl doesn't drop 8% (and an additional 3% after hours on Thursday) on Robinhood types having margin calls.
If Potus did say soldiers who died in action are 'losers,' he's done.
And that possibility to this anon was the reason for the sell-off that could very well gain some steam in the coming week.