>>10548114

NOT NOTABLE.

Sorry, folks, but Congress acted in the 1800s to remove the disabillity of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. There is no right to disqualify or remove elected officials for insurrection or giving comfort to the enemy.

Again, sorry folks. LET'S PREVENT THIS MISINFORMATION FROM SPREADING.

The right to remove disabilities imposed by this section was exercised by Congress at different times on behalf of enumerated individuals.1 In 1872, the disabilities were removed, by a blanket act, from all persons "except Senators and Representatives of the Thirty-sixth and Thirty-seventh Congresses, officers in the judicial, military and naval service of the United States, heads of departments, and foreign ministers of the United States."2 Twenty-six years later, Congress enacted that "the disability imposed by section 3 . . . incurred heretofore, is hereby removed."

Sauce: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt14-S3-1-1/ALDE_00000848/

>>10548350

Check the text of Section 3, fren:

Section 3

No Person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Wanting it to be so is not enough. I suggest reading the Constitution before trying to interpret it.