If you want to digg on "near zero results" Q was responding to me from RG#88 in RG#89. He didnt directly reply to me he replied to a post supposedly refuting my hypothesis. But it didnt. I was referring to the near zero results from Durham. Undeniably true at this point and yes remains to be seen but gee now were past that 60 day mark and sorry but KC was very dissapointing. If you look further back in 88 you may see what pissed Q off prompting my shill or uninformed label by him. Im no shill. And the fact i rasied the possibility proved im informed of everything and have been following this before day 1 oct 2017. I raised the possibility that we are vulnerable to having the truth hidden forever by nature of this board. If durham does not come thru then Qanon research, truth and all, can be bundled up into a neat little bow and labeled a conspiracy theory thereby hiding the truth for good. I also later posed the q that these indictments whatever the massive count have not been independently verified on this board. So Im still a skeptic on the extent of that. Thats no shill talk. To be honest there are three possibilities. 1. Q is working for us. 2. Q works for them i.e. is bundling the truth. 3. Q is a patriot but has no access. reg. 3, ive never been convinced of some of these proofs. if yoy want me to prove i can make posts against DJT twatter within 10-30sec give me a few days of coding. Sorry but I still think for myself and have done so long before Q showed up. He/she just called me a shill. OVER THE TARGET?