>>10640122 (pb)
Nonstandard approach to learning to code:
https://watchandcode.com/
Very well thought out, and good for those on many different levels I think.
Why is this shoddy attempt to further dox and defame the apparent manager of qmap in notables?
This is flimsy crap. Anyone who thinks this graphic reveals anything important apart the person who has been running that website is an idiot.
The site has long been one of the most valuable tools for anyone following Q. Anyone arguing to the contrary had best learn what constitutes a good argument, and should present it, instead of producing such scurrilous crap.
>>>10640663, >>10640777 PANIC: Qmap.pub Website Shuts Down After N.J. Man Identified as Operator (Bloomberg)
This title is utterly misleading, and neither of these posts are notable. They both offer unsourced attacks on the owner of qmap.pub, but the baker is disguising the posts as "news". But the fact that the qmap owner was doxxed has been REPEATEDLY reported and is NOT NOTABLE.
The first supposed notable simply cites the Bloomberg story while also adding completely BASELESS attacks on qmap.pub. By all means, if there is evidence that the site was comped, present it. But this hasn't been done.
The second post is utter shit. See:
Screenshots of amazon wishlists and photos of the boyfriend(?) of the sister(?) of the girlfriend(?) of the site-owner. I think a MUCH higher standard is needed before such stuff goes into notables, given that most sensible anons regard qmap.pub as a valuable resource, from which Q has repeatedly posted.
>By all means, if there is evidence that the site was comped, present it.
You are not good at reading, or thinking.
The second often follows from the first.
I seriously hope he is OK, but some Q drops seem relevant. Think for yourself.