Anonymous ID: 421ce5 Sept. 17, 2020, 4:51 a.m. No.10679992   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0029

>>10679979

>that is another baker's bred. this baker doesn't mess with other baker notes.

>eva.

Based.

>>10679967

>After a certain time, if someone isn't convicted, the samples are supposed to be destroyed.

Just like the blood sample taken for every newborn? Even those born at home (nurse comes to home to prick and take the sample. verified.)

Anonymous ID: 421ce5 Sept. 17, 2020, 5:05 a.m. No.10680067   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10680029

>Anon, I get what you're saying and I don't neccessarily believe that THEY DO DESTROY the samples as per the reg's, but belief and proof are two different things. The statement in the article is BASELESS and not sauced.

Noted fren. 23 and me. Muh luv going out to you, wishing you a most wonder filled day anon. appreciate your inputs, record will show.