Anonymous ID: fbeb04 Sept. 17, 2020, 10:39 p.m. No.10691276   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1297 >>1319 >>1337

>>10691233

>Throw a mostly transparent image of a crosswalk over a meme, and algo will see a crosswalk.

^^^^^THIS^^^^^

 

1000x this

 

The human eye see's the meme (if you do the camo right)

 

The AI sees the transparency layer (again, if you do it right)

 

It is the fact that the AI is seeing your transparency layer that is causing the mitigation

 

If the AI didnt see the transparency layer, it would be seeing whats left, the original meme

 

 

That Being Said

 

just about any pattern is going to work, provided the block size of the pattern is large enough

 

it has been tested that small dots interference actually doesnt work, the algo still sees the underlying meme

pic related

 

SO

 

Why dont we use official Democrati Party logos and election media as our transparency layers?

 

The AI will start identifying the transparency layer in order to counter our meme insertion.

 

As the AI "learns" the transparency layer it needs to filter, it will be "learning" official democratic party media logos

 

hence, theoretically, it will pop false positives on genuine Democratic media

 

poison the filter

all your AI are belong to us

 

o7

Anonymous ID: fbeb04 Sept. 17, 2020, 10:48 p.m. No.10691336   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1359

>>10691268

>all three got sniffed

this is all through tineye right?

absolutely should develop the most robust techniques for beating image snifers

 

but

 

it seems Twitters image sniffer is behind tin-eye

 

because all of those techniques beat Twitters sniffer

 

-keks

Anonymous ID: fbeb04 Sept. 17, 2020, 10:51 p.m. No.10691356   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10691291

>This didn't come up with a result, with Yandex

5:5

 

but original subjact matter integrity has beenโ€ฆ. sacrificed severely

/obviousanon is obvious

 

keep working it, if we figure out how to beat the tineye sniffer, Twitter/FB wont have a chance, even as they try to deply countermeasures