Anonymous ID: bd89b5 Sept. 17, 2020, 11:02 p.m. No.10691421   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10691396

>my reason behind using the mickey is precisely because of what you point out. If we can defeat detection there, everything else should be cherry?

 

this is exactly whi I think this is a valuable line of effort

 

I mean its the tineye image sniffer too

 

but apparently it way more robust than what we were working with on that biden collage on the Twitter sniffer

 

exactly what above anon said

if we can come up with a workable technique that preserves image integrity but also defeats the tineye filter, we just upgraded our force multiplyer many fold

 

I say keep it up

 

o7

Anonymous ID: bd89b5 Sept. 17, 2020, 11:22 p.m. No.10691536   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1554 >>1663 >>1704 >>1749 >>1870 >>1990 >>2108 >>2144

>>10691518

>except that the one that matters right now is Twitter

all of the social media sites are obviously the most important fighting ground, anon

in case you hadent noticed, we have that algorith dead to rights

 

>>>/qresearch/10660694

 

anon was wondering what to do next as we have multiple different techniques that work against twitter

 

instead of sitting on our thumbs, why not attempt to defeat an even more advanced sniffer?

 

Twitter isnt going to be this easy forever (Q said 2-4 days, its been a week -kek, I guess were just that good)

 

5:5 anon

keep em comin'

 

o7

Anonymous ID: bd89b5 Sept. 17, 2020, 11:28 p.m. No.10691561   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1577 >>1774

>>10691550

>nighty nite, anon.

Now I lay me down to sleep.

I pray the Lord my soul to keep.

 

If I should die before I wake,

I pray to God my soul to take.

 

If I should live for other days,

I pray the Lord to guide my ways.

 

For God and Country, anon

sleep well

 

o7

Anonymous ID: bd89b5 Sept. 17, 2020, 11:32 p.m. No.10691580   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1591 >>1624 >>1656 >>1663 >>1704 >>1749 >>1870 >>1990 >>2108 >>2144

>>10691554

>TinEye isn't a social media site

I totally agree anon

my point was a concession that the social media sites were clearly more important than TinEye on the tasking orders

absolutely agree on that

 

BUT

 

we have succefully mitigates Twitter (for now)

so we are currenty at the point of diminishing returns to keep coming up with MORE ideas that defeat Twitters sniffer

 

TinEye on the other ground has fertile ground for further development

for the sheer fact that it seems like TinEye has a more robust sniffer than Twitter

 

hence

 

if we manage to create techniques that consistently mitigate the TinEye sniffer, we will have them ready to deploy when the socials (FB/Twatter/Insta/Reddit/etc etc etc) up their sniffer game

 

5:5 anon

o7

Anonymous ID: bd89b5 Sept. 17, 2020, 11:37 p.m. No.10691608   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1618 >>1625

>>10691591

>personally, I'd focus on efforts that were more time relevant. but that's me.

anon

Twitter algo sniffer isalreadyproper fucked

our work over the past week has been VERY succeful on the socials

do you have any examples ofincompletetasking that is more important?

 

o7

Anonymous ID: bd89b5 Sept. 17, 2020, 11:47 p.m. No.10691659   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1982

>>10691624

>Throwing it out there in case it helps

5:5 anon!

it was actually a thinkeranon (kek), not a graphics/memefag that originally suggested the transparency layer camo we are currently working with

we absolutely need all types weighing in

going to drop your post into the camo thread

I have not seen this bot you speak of, but those pics you reference sounds spoopy

thank you anon

keep em comin'

Anonymous ID: bd89b5 Sept. 17, 2020, 11:53 p.m. No.10691700   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1713

>>10691630

have been brainstorming where to go next

I was wondering if there was any atributes in .png images that delineate "layers"

or do all the vector image atrubutes get "baked" into something that is impossible to reverse engineer from the .png?

 

like would it be able to just filter for atribute if_has_layers=yes, then: (ignore top layer? something to that effect)

 

would cutting the base image into pieces and sending the pieces to different layers in the vector have any effect? (not changing the image, just cutting it into squares and making each square its own layer, all layers visible obviously)

 

did that question make sense? -kek

Anonymous ID: bd89b5 Sept. 18, 2020, 12:02 a.m. No.10691760   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1772 >>1784 >>1798 >>1870 >>1990 >>2108 >>2144

>>10691656

>i disagree.

I could certainly be making that call early

definitely not advocating we stop taking shots at the Twitter algo

 

I would like to be 3-4 revision AHEAD of the twitter algo

 

for example

the basic lvl 1 4 corner boxesSTILLworks on twitter

 

the qr code style 'digital camo' transparency layer was revision 2

 

taking the binary clear block/ opaque block pattern to a multiple levels of opacity or even different colors and opacity in the opaque blocks was revision 2.1

 

taking that 2.1 camo pattern and writing code to randomize it was revision 2.2

 

taking that concept and applying all manner of textures beyond cubic is revision 2.3

 

revision 3 is?

 

the definition dont matter obviously, but you get my point

Anonymous ID: bd89b5 Sept. 18, 2020, 12:06 a.m. No.10691787   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1796

>>10691675

>they can't do it quickly.

this

all of these effort are short term for the election

all of the shit that is going to look so bad for biden/spygate/fisagate/durham etc etc etc and more is going to attempt to be censored

we need to have mitigation for that

 

they do NOT have -any- time on their side

just over 40 days to election day?

 

they havent even mitigated the lvl 1 black box corners yet!

 

its been a week

 

they are fucking toast

Anonymous ID: bd89b5 Sept. 18, 2020, 12:33 a.m. No.10691906   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10691853

Parallel Investigation

Stellarwind data is not technically "legally" collected (muh search warrants)

 

soโ€ฆ

 

there is a thing called Parallel Investigation

wherin;

 

the information from stellarwind is used by a "legitimately legally predicated investigation"

 

this totally legally predicated investigation team uses the information to conduct a thourough investigation

 

during the course of the investigation, they know where to place their surveillence to gather engough evidence for a legitimate request for a search warrant

 

-because they have it all

 

they know exactlywherethey want to gather that surveillence in order to eventually serve a search warrant

 

-because they have it all

 

they already know whats there (stellarwind) but now they have a legal search warrant to go retreive it

 

now they can legally gather all of the evidence they already know is there from stellarwind

 

at the end of the day, NONE of the data/info from stellarwind will see the light of a courtroom

 

it will have all been gathered IN PARALLEL through the course of a legally predicated investigation

 

 

that is at least how I understand it

Anonymous ID: bd89b5 Sept. 18, 2020, 1:01 a.m. No.10692021   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10691995

rofl anon

the relative recognizability of the base signal is going to have a large influence on how degraded the signal can become and still resolve the message

 

the mona lisa is like the most recognizable image on the planet? kek

Anonymous ID: bd89b5 Sept. 18, 2020, 1:34 a.m. No.10692141   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10692118

>I like to copy/paste Q posts into comment sections of SM accounts that get very high views.

Notable

 

anon that is fucking brilliant

>drop Q drops WITHOUT the Q into chat groups

>normies find information interesting/ enjoy playing the logic game and answering questions

>normie later finds Q

>Q drops seem familiar somehowโ€ฆ..

 

this

is

fucking

genious

 

or at least top level autist