dChan
Anonymous ID: 326176 Sept. 18, 2020, 1:39 a.m. No.10692165   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2172 >>2272 >>2336 >>2381 >>2515 >>2652 >>2800 >>2924

>>10692140 pb

>Really, twitter handle too?

 

i think you'll get shadowbanned or your tweets will appear in the 'show more replies' section if your account makes references to qanon (in the name, profile picture, bio, posts) because you engage in 'potentially harmful behavior' and the sniffer will easily detect the references

 

>https://shadowban.eu

 

>Something unexpected went wrong.

 

<If Twitter's signals determine that an account might engage in harmful behavior, Twitter hides their replies behind a barrier and only loads them when "Show more replies" is clicked. This behavior is personalized, i.e. Twitter does not hide the tweets of accounts you follow. We therefore use an unbiased reference account without followings in order to determine whether tweets within a thread can be retrieved without clicking "Show more replies" from its view. In some cases, Twitter classifies accounts as offensive. In this case, replies are hidden behind a second barrier within the "Show more replies" section.

Anonymous ID: 326176 Sept. 18, 2020, 1:40 a.m. No.10692167   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2179 >>2183 >>2269 >>2336 >>2381 >>2515 >>2652 >>2800 >>2924

>>10692118 pb

 

notablerepost

 

how to redpill normies:

 

'I like to copy/paste Q posts into comment sections of SM accounts that get very high views. I just don't add the last line where it is identified/signed "Q".

 

It's amazing how many people immediately recognize it as a Q post… but, I really like it when people don't know of Q, but give very good responses/answers to the questions. It's an easy way to redpill without turning people off because of the cs label. It's funny too how many of the liberals (not knowing it's copy/paste Q) agree/give positive responses and answers.'

Anonymous ID: 326176 Sept. 18, 2020, 2:24 a.m. No.10692317   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10692280

>>10692280

>Add a little bit of carefully constructed noise and the same neural network now thinks this is an image of a gibbon with 99.3% confidence! This is, clearly, an optical illusion — but for the neural network. You and I can clearly tell that both the images look like pandas — in fact, we can’t even tell that some noise has been added to the original image to construct the adversarial example on the right!

 

notable

Anonymous ID: 326176 Sept. 18, 2020, 4:08 a.m. No.10692681   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10692664

btw this script uses random values for

 

>strength

>block size

>rotation angle

>scale

 

it should trick the sniffer even better

 

<mod_img d0c1fafac401c0e4c55b8e9a628cf0a2cc385fc95309e07cc60d64d3b4598019.png output4.png

Strength 20, Blocksize: 28, Angle: 34, Scale: 3

 

<mod_img d0c1fafac401c0e4c55b8e9a628cf0a2cc385fc95309e07cc60d64d3b4598019.png output5.png

Strength 15, Blocksize: 20, Angle: 74, Scale: 5

Anonymous ID: 326176 Sept. 18, 2020, 4:34 a.m. No.10692751   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2755 >>2757

>>10692736

>I found that certain people when they hear the word 'cabal', they quit listening and get their backs against the wall (fear of knowing the truth?)

 

it's not fear, it's the way they've been programmed

 

deep state, cabal, globalist, elite, pizzagate, adrenochrome, reptilian, satanic ritual, child sacrifice, spirit cooking, qanon, pepe, ritual, enslave humanity, pedos

 

trigger a 'conspiracy' or 'far-right' response from normies

 

you can say instead:

 

>corrupt politicians/people in charge

>they put their own interests first and have double standards

>selfish politicians

>child abuser, rapist

>rights infringement

Anonymous ID: 326176 Sept. 18, 2020, 4:43 a.m. No.10692779   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2784

>>10692753

>It is genetic…..they remember the Gods.

 

yes

 

the gods that brought knowledge

 

the people of the sea

 

>>10692774

>twitter IS converting the .png to a .jpegFYI

 

so maybe i should convert it to a jpeg online and then apply the script

Anonymous ID: 326176 Sept. 18, 2020, 4:53 a.m. No.10692822   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>10692811

>>10692815

>probably apraching the bottom limit of transparency here

 

the blur isn't very apparent

 

twitter should have a hard time will the random outputs

>but load a few more with progressively less transparency in .jpeg form over in the /thread/ and I will test tomorrow to confirm the bottom of the range for this scripted pattern

 

or maybe here and other anons will test