Anonymous ID: 7294fe Sept. 18, 2020, 2:13 a.m. No.10692267   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2276 >>2454

The Book of John

 

Chapter 13

 

1 It was just before the Passover Festival. Jesus knew that the hour had come for him to leave this world and go to the Father. Having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them to the end.

 

2 The evening meal was in progress, and the devil had already prompted Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot, to betray Jesus.

 

3 Jesus knew that the Father had put all things under his power, and that he had come from God and was returning to God;

 

4 so he got up from the meal, took off his outer clothing, and wrapped a towel around his waist.

 

5 After that, he poured water into a basin and began to wash his disciplesโ€™ feet, drying them with the towel that was wrapped around him.

 

6 He came to Simon Peter, who said to him, โ€œLord, are you going to wash my feet?โ€

 

7 Jesus replied,โ€œYou do not realize now what I am doing, but later you will understand.โ€

 

8 โ€œNo,โ€ said Peter, โ€œyou shall never wash my feet.โ€

 

Jesus answered, โ€œUnless I wash you, you have no part with me.โ€

 

9 โ€œThen, Lord,โ€ Simon Peter replied, โ€œnot just my feet but my hands and my head as well!โ€

 

10 Jesus answered, โ€œThose who have had a bath need only to wash their feet; their whole body is clean. And you are clean, though not every one of you.โ€

 

11 For he knew who was going to betray him, and that was why he said not every one was clean.

 

12 When he had finished washing their feet, he put on his clothes and returned to his place.โ€œDo you understand what I have done for you?โ€he asked them.

 

13 โ€œYou call me โ€˜Teacherโ€™ and โ€˜Lord,โ€™ and rightly so, for that is what I am.

 

14 Now that I, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also should wash one anotherโ€™s feet.

 

15I have set you an example that you should do as I have done for you.

 

16 Very truly I tell you, no servant is greater than his master, nor is a messenger greater than the one who sent him.

 

17Now that you know these things, you will be blessed if you do them.

 

Now that you know these things

 

You will be blessed if you do them

 

comes, anons

wash youre feet

Anonymous ID: 7294fe Sept. 18, 2020, 3:18 a.m. No.10692511   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2539 >>2581

>>10692496

>Do these get past Twitter's sniffer?

need to be on Twitters blacklist first before we can get a confirmed pass or fail on Twitters sniffer

images in the Twitter blacklist will result in lockout of account in ~5 seonds from posting

if the orriginal un-edited image does not instantly result in your account being locked, its not in the blacklist

so, for testing purposes on Twitter, you need to start with something that isknownto be in the blacklist

this can be confirmed easily by attempting to post a raw image and seeing oyu account get locked out nearly instantly

 

if you have a Twitter account try it with pic related

it isconfirmedin the Twitter blacklist

 

to add some more sauce to the puzzle

the original anon that posted this image of biden was in an argument on Twitter with someone

anon went to google image search and just types biden groping kids (kek) and pulled this from the top hits

hence, I dont think the algorithm picked THIS image for the blacklist

some human did

and it was picked because it is a rather popular pic that is being passed around many circles

hence, high google SEO (search engine optimization)

 

as an idea on how to find MORE images that are in twitters blacklist

 

o7

Anonymous ID: 7294fe Sept. 18, 2020, 3:37 a.m. No.10692582   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2626

>>10692539

for example, anon

 

pics relatedPASSthe twitter sniffer

as an example of how low you can go on transparency

 

with the transparency later in pic related, I was able to drop down to 6% opacity

@5% it tripped the sniffer and got me locked out

Anonymous ID: 7294fe Sept. 18, 2020, 3:42 a.m. No.10692603   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>10692581

twitter seems to effectively ignore color shifting as long as it is apploed universally to the whole image /

its more looking at the "architecture" in the image

the shapes/ angles/ etc

Images #1-3 probably fail

Image #4 in your set is highly likely to pass twitters sniffer

will test

Anonymous ID: 7294fe Sept. 18, 2020, 4:22 a.m. No.10692719   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2725

>>10692706

>ok

I need to head to bed, anon

if you wouldnt mind making a few more with progressively less 'strength' (transparency) and dropping them over in the /thread/

will test tomorrow

 

here: >>>/qresearch/10660694

 

thank you VERY much for taking the time to work on exploiting the sniffer

something tells me this project will have a long life of usefulness

 

o7

Anonymous ID: 7294fe Sept. 18, 2020, 4:35 a.m. No.10692758   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2765

>>10692714

PASS, butโ€ฆ

 

something odd is happeneing when Twitter convers these to .jpeg

so, I took a cap before I hit the tweet button, and it still looks like the one you uploaded

 

the image you uploaded, you can BARELY tell there is any transparency layer

 

as soon as I upload it to twitter, it looks more like strength = 5 -see the pass confirm

 

I downloaded it back from Twitter, and sure enough, it does not match the one I had just uploaded in a side by sideโ€ฆ wtf?

 

check out the pics related

 

the raw image is the re-download from Twitter of what is supposed to be the lowest strength one you have uploaded.

 

it clearly isntโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: 7294fe Sept. 18, 2020, 4:42 a.m. No.10692774   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2779

>>10692765

>is it only me or did twitter make it less visible?

twitter made the transparency camo layer MORE visible

hence,

making the meme LESS visible

I dont know why that that is happeneing, but I tried it 3 times

its definintely not me

you can see the pic that still has the "tweet" button

I had not hit send yet, and the transparency layer is correctly almost invisible

 

then I hit the tweet button, it loads to my feed, and the transparency layer just got stronger???

 

dafuq is that?

 

twitter IS converting the .png to a .jpegFYI

Anonymous ID: 7294fe Sept. 18, 2020, 4:45 a.m. No.10692784   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2791

>>10692779

>so maybe i should convert it to a jpeg online and then apply the script

worth a shot!

that way Twitter doesnt attempt the filetype conversion

interesting indeed

first time I noticed any difference in what I uploaded vs what made it onto my feed