Anonymous ID: dac17e Sept. 18, 2020, 2:17 a.m. No.10692289   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2326 >>2381 >>2515 >>2652 >>2800 >>2924

It's just crazy how much corruption there really is. 2020 is the year of census which is held every 10 years according to constitution. Basically every 10 years population is counted but the problem here is that they have slowly removed the question about citizenship which means all illegal aliens are counted too. So now you might be wondering why does this matter, other than making inaccurate statistics? Well let me just quote what the Supreme Court said about this: "The population count derived from the census is used not only to apportion representatives but also to allocate federal funds to the States and to draw electoral districts. Wisconsin v. City of New York, 517 U. S. 1, 5–6 (1996). The census additionally serves as a means of collecting demographic information, which β€œis used for such varied purposes as computing federal grant-in-aid benefits, draft-ing of legislation, urban and regional planning, business planning, and academic and social studies.” Baldrige v. Shapiro, 455 U. S. 345, 353–354, n. 9 (1982)" As you can see, number of population in each state determines how many seats they get in congress, electoral districts, how much federal grand-in aid they get and much more. According to statistics, there are atleast over 10 million illegal immigrants in the United States and these stats are from 2016. California alone had over 3 million while Texas comes 2nd with 1.5 million.

This citizenship question was brought up to the Supreme Court last april(after lower courts had rejected it) and they made a decision on june 27th of 2019. Unfortunately DS justices slammed it down too. It was later reported Trump admin was no longer trying to pursue this through courts but trying to find other ways to get past it.

 

So they got illegal aliens inflating their real population numbers in certain states to falsely get more seats in congress so what else can they do to cheat the system? That's right, they can just let you vote without an ID. States such as CA, OR, NV, WY, MN, NE, NM, IL, NC, MD, DC, PA, NJ, MA, NY, VT and ME require zero documents to vote. Absolutely nothing stops you from voting thousand times and this is what illegal aliens have for sure taken advantage of to help democrats. It's also fair to mention majority of other states are not any better, for example even though Alaska requires an ID(no photo required) you can still vote without an ID "if election official knows you" and if you just get one corrupted election official there, well you can imagine what it means.

 

Every logical person at this point can draw very clear questions: If you aren't legally in the country, why would you be counted as part of the population, the population which determines how many seats the state you're illegally staying in gets in congress, amongst many other things mentioned above? Why would all courts up to the Supreme Court support this idea of counting illegals part of the population? Why would 17 states let you vote without any type of documentation, making it very likely same people vote who knows how many times because nothing is stopping them? What is the only conclusion we can draw from this?

 

DRAIN THE SWAMP

 

Sources:

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/memorandum-excluding-illegal-aliens-apportionment-base-following-2020-census/

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/18-966_bq7c.pdf

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/upshot/election-2016-voting-precinct-maps.html

https://www.statista.com/statistics/629682/state-populations-of-illegal-immigrants-in-the-united-states-2014/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewsolender/2020/07/21/trump-to-sign-memorandum-excluding-illegal-immigrants-from-congressional-representation/

https://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/voter-id.aspx#Laws%20in%20Effect

Anonymous ID: dac17e Sept. 18, 2020, 3:25 a.m. No.10692530   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun   >>2545

>>10692423

 

This is a tough one. Public schools have very limited options when it comes to promoting just one religion and "the other side" often refers back to Supreme Court decision Engel v. Vitale which set the foundation to it. I think it's morally very wrong ACLU decided to pursue this case but I'm not surprised they did so because as President Trump has said before "they've been trying to drive god out from our homes for a long time" Hopefully President Trump can figure out some kind of way which satisfies all parties.

Anonymous ID: dac17e Sept. 18, 2020, 3:33 a.m. No.10692566   πŸ—„οΈ.is πŸ”—kun

>>10692545

 

That's true. However if what was written on the lawsuit was true, this seemed to lean more towards promoting which made them legally subject to a lawsuit according to Engel v. Vitale decision.