Just some thinking I have been doing.

We are in a silent war now. (Running RED?) The D’s fired an early October Surprise with the Bob Woodward Bombshell book trying to keep focus on Trump’s supposed Coronavirus failure. Trump implied Woodward was a highly over-rated has-been. In response to their surprise hit, which actually misses, Trump responds with his surprise…announcing the Death of RBG, another highly over rated has-been. And…who released the notice of her death? The SC did. Roberts in is charge of the SC, so one could assume that Chief Justice John Roberts (btw, Lin Wood has been hitting Roberts hard lately..hmm) is in charge and would have approved the release. Does this mean Roberts is now under White hat control? I think so. That means Trump hit back twice as hard. Maybe three times as hard. Not only did he take-out RBG, figuratively speaking, of course, but he also took the virus off the no. 1 spot while showing the deep state that Roberts is under his control now.

All of this happened while we were ‘rigged for red’. But now that we are running red, I assume this tit for tat scenario will be happening at a faster and at higher stakes. Q (White Hats) have THEIR playbook. Do they know everything that will come our way? Maybe, maybe not. But Q team is prepared and will respond with missiles that strike 1000 times worse, as Trump just implied, he would do with Iran if they struck us.

So, Buckle Up! It’s going to be a barrage of surprise attacks going both ways, with each one increasing in severity. I believe that RBG was a total shock to them. Whether she was already dead or not, they thought they controlled the timing and Roberts. Neither is true and they didn’t like it.

It is possible that the "hunt for Red October' may be when their 'biggest missile' is turned back against them.

>>10720175

well, that would fit with what I was thinking.

The DS has many surprise hits coming our way. The White Hats will be firing back and deflecting them back.

The DS now knows for certain that they are not in control. The thought they were in control of RBG's death time and in control of Chief Justice Roberts….and now they know THEY NEVER WERE once Trump took office.

Imagine the shock they are in.

>>10720191

ok.

I still think that the DS was certain they controlled RBG death time and Roberts.

They learned that they controlled neither. They must be scrambling now.

>>10720257

>DID McCONNELL PREDICT WHEN RBG DEMISE WOULD HAPPEN?

Was he able to predict because he knew?

I think so.

I think the most important take away from RBG's death, beside the obvious, is that the Ds were shown that not did they lose control of when her death was announce, but they also LOST CONTROL OF JOHN ROBERTS.

They have to be in a panic to know that they cannot win at the SC now. They are sure to lose all voting cases and election cases.

Their desperately need some new plans.

they don't even have talking points for RBG's death yet.

>>10720311

>would not rule out launching impeachment proceedings

This is what David Axlerod was implying yesterday on CNN

>>10720571

>I have no choice makes more sense to me given his previous tweet.

That is what normies will think. They will just assume he had a typo and meant he had no choice.

But as we know, he means what he writes.

He gave no choice.

>>10720566

> He gave them no choice.

The question I have is what is he referring to.

no choice on when she departed?

no choice on when to nominate and vote?

no choice on who has to vote and who doesn't?

so many choices connected with RBG

>>10720602

> Flynn will Find his Freedom

They used Flynn as a missile.

I wonder if it is time to turn that missile back against them before the election.

>>10720709

the sauce you gave doesn't provide any proof of you claim about obama foundation

>>10720746

sauce?

>>10720769

I am suggesting that he forced the announcement of her death if she was already dead like many assume.

Maybe somebody denied her some special treatment that kept her 'alive'.

I am in no way assuming that he killed her. If that was even close to the truth, then fakenews would be all over it and be showing recent. pictures of her in perfect health .

But we have not seen Ruth for months. We have heard 'her voice' in court proceedings.

But was it really her? Do you have any proof at all that she was alive or not in a vegetable state.

Maybe she is still alive and Roberts was forced to announce her death.

And to disprove her death, the DS would have to show pics of her alive….AND THEY CAN'T DO THAT.

I said that Trump, FIGURATIVELY, took her out as in ..out of the picture.

That wasn't hard to do because she is not even in pictures anymoar.

>>10720769

another thing to consider is that we know No Name did not depart on his own terms.

What does that mean to you?

would that imply to you that TRump killed no name.

Maybe Ruthie took nonames route and decided it was time to depart on her own

There are many way she could have 'departed' now without Trump having killed her as you are implying

>>10720907

would that mean that the enemy may not know you are down there?