Recently Bakers have been making changes to the dough without taking into consideration Anons thoughts. Bakers tend to congregate on /comms/ while the bulk of anons do not travel there. This can and has caused a disconnect between Bakers and Anons, which leads to mistrust and the opportunity for subversion and division.

I suggest instead of Bakers discussing bread changes and important decisions that affect all of /Qresearch/ be conducted here. I am going to ask that this bread be added to stickies and for anons to participate in the discussion. Issues that arise on /Qresearch/ should be done in the full view of Anons.

Issues such as bakers deleting notables

Changes to the dough

Hand off procedures

Issues on the board

Shill tactics

And so on

This is not a thread to thrash any one baker.

Recently there has been multiple issues with different off-board links added to the dough in Qresearch General threads

/warroom/

/abcu/

/qrmemes/

/qrb/

/comms/

The push is continuous and when one is knocked down another is created.

/warroom/ removed and a few days later /QRmemes/ was pushed for.

The board owner of /ABCU/ is the guy that used to spam the board with patches and claim to be NSA/USmil intel/ and who knows how many other "idenitities"

/QRmemes/ has a shadow board owner but appears to be another part of the Endchan crew.

>>10739043

>The board owner of /ABCU/ is the guy that used to spam the board with patches and claim to be NSA/USmil intel/ and who knows how many other "idenitities"

I told you no lies. I am who I stated. You can review and check to see if my info was valid on your own if you would like.

Yes, I have many names as do most anons who use the nets.

Your choice to try to make me look bad. Will only backfire. Your attempts to make things personal and not about the movement are a weak move and will not work well for you.

Many bakers know me and many anons as well. Only very few had an issue with the patches and the MASSIVE amount of info I/We provided.

Best of luck

< Enjoy this patch!

.

>>10739179

>Yes, I have many names as do most anons who use the nets.

>

>Your choice to try to make me look bad. Will only backfire. Your attempts to make things personal and not about the movement are a weak move and will not work well for you.

Not trying to make you look bad, just letting anons know who you are. You stated on /comms/ you didn't care if /ABCU/ was in the dough. I think the Anons should be given that choice.

Whether you mean harm or not you spammed the boards for weeks in the "run-up" to creating your own board. Anons should be in the discussion as to what goes in the dough, QR general is not the place for that discussion.

>>10739235

>QR general is not the place for that discussion.

Can not agree more.

>>10739179

>>10739235

I created this bread because I disagree with bakers making decisions on the board without ever giving anons a chance to have input without travelling off board. If anons think /abcu/ should be in the dough I am for it, whether I agree with you or your sincerity.

>>10739235

No my board (>>>/abcu/) existed prior to that period. BTW.

Do not assume things you dont know about, Please we are a TRUTH/FACT movement. this doesn't need to diluted by assumptions and opinions.

Our operations went from 4/20 - 5/5.

I have always been on the board. It was a success as We stated.

I look forward to seeing Anons input.

But As stated. ABCU never requested to be in the dough.

I will let anons chime in more before I give you any more input.

>>10739260

> If anons think /abcu/ should be in the dough I am for it, whether I agree with you or your sincerity.

This i understand completely. I did not request anyone trust or a following. Only provided info.

<3

This is why baker mirrors all of their dough onto Qbin.

Pays close attention to who does not use Qbin. (Likely because of IP Fears or some shit)

[Fearof getting caught]

The ones that don't use qbin appear . . .Inconsistent.

Mirroring makes it easy to go back to when dough changes are made.

Have noticed some bakers would "Flip" notables Grabbing notables from a previous bread and then "Flipping" them and reposting with new Link..

Honestly doesn't matter to baker if they are ascending or descending as long as they are consecutive whichever way they go for Logics and organization/readability's sake.

As far as other sections go.

''When baker first arrived to Comms things were sketchy because bakers were just working through "allegedly" a bout of bad blood.''

Offended bakers would often shadow (if they are really people\bakers) and imitate personality traits modeled by bakers of potential interest or object of confusion debate… {Doesn't this sound familiar?}

Pretty sure it has already been said.

Either way baker was sketch so veered away mostly. Stuck to lurking and following trends: Bread pace, content, - shills~their manipulation/assault/misinformation, Frenly interactions ofbakers and how to handle Qposts.

Baker mainly learned on their own but then again it kind of is a self teaching process.

Having the Baking Meta on the QR board makes it easier for bakers to congregate in a "baker specific" area while not far from the Storm that is /qresearch/current bread.

Response times for handoff area to flag for handoff without going too far off board recruit etcetera.

Not that the battle against evil isnt already won, now it is merely a battle against ignorance. Ignorance the invisible enemy seeks so often to exploit and pit us against each other with.

>>10740083

Have noticed some bakers would "Flip" notables Grabbing notables from a previous bread and then "Flipping" them and reposting with new Link..

>''This is most likely when that type of shit happens''

Honestly doesn't matter to baker if they are ascending or descending as long as they are consecutive whichever way they go for Logics and organization/readability's sake.

The BO of ABCU I believe was interviewed by Jim Watkins during a show and he has been on there more than once. . . I could be wrong but I thought I saw an interview from Jim on ABCU. So. there's that. Looking for it but dont hold your breath. You know how they do him on the interweb.

>>10740109

Yes I do know Jim Watkins and we talk every now and then.

I did interview Jim on 9/2/2020.

You can find it here.

https://www.youtube.com/c/AmericanBroadcastingCommUnity/

https://youtu.be/S9TNzhPZM78

No need to hold your breath. I am "George Orwell" the BO of /abcu/ and all those other names listed.

Fake Names Real News.

>>10740083

>>10740095

>>10740109

I disagree, I don't use Qbin because I don't know who made Qbin and I am not giving another unknown entity my IP address directly linked to my doughs when I bake.

M m m… Noted.

>>10740204

>>10740204

Who made Qbin?

It was pushed around the time baker started baking

>>10740227

>Who made Qbin?

great question, just appeared because pastebin was suddenly no longer good enough anymore, but no reason was ever given why.

>>10740244

Whelp This is concerning.

I thought the reason was that Pastebin was disappearing peoples doughs and the like.

Capatchas were another complaint I remember. Having problems with Capatcha and dough creations was a fact I remember but perhaps my memory serves me wrong.

My pastes disappeared also one time but then it reappeared. It was very strange.

So I started using Qbin also.

Perhaps the creator will appear on this thread and provide some credentials and clarity. . .

>>10740304

>I thought the reason was that Pastebin was disappearing peoples doughs and the like.

I've never had a dough disappear on pastebin. Ever.

>Capatchas were another complaint I remember. Having problems with Capatcha and dough creations was a fact I remember but perhaps my memory serves me wrong.

I get a captcha 1 out of every 15 attempts and they are the simplest capthas ever. 8kun captcha hell can be much worse.

>Perhaps the creator will appear on this thread and provide some credentials and clarity. . .

And this is why I have never and will never use Qbin and never go there without a VPN running. If it ain't broke you don't fix it and pastebin was never broke. So what other reason would someone put so much work into making a site, to collect information. If you aren't the customer you are the product.

>>10740327

>And this is why I have never and will never use Qbin and never go there without a VPN running

And I follow this same principal for /comms/ or any other off-board Q related boards.

>>10740327

>>10740348

Comms felt really fucking weird when baker arrived there. The reiteration must simply be made.

Learned how to bake on my own anyway by simply watching and watching bread after bred…

Nothing wrong pride in confidence of ability.

Note the utter silence. Perhaps this hasn't been seen yet.

. . . especially when it comes to the format of the board Q has been posting on as this thing unfolds.

Q told us to "Lock it up!" Protect our identities and the like so baker has taken that precaution since starting.

Just when baker was getting comfy w qbin and other newbakers.

>>10740437

I taught myself to bake as well and never took the class there. I have posted this bread on /comms/ and other bakers have stated they will not use this bread. That is fine, I made this bread for Anons, not bakers.

>>10740471

Didnt anons originally create this /qresearch/ board. . .?

Yup Q posts on this board so it must be from the same creators who constructed the original 8ch board.

No clue why bakers would refuse this bread for discussions outside of /comms/ or what.

To baker this is like the FOB Baker Recruitment Discussion Bread. Logical.

and if you arent OSS it will come out as such with endless explanations of how you are fake so looking forward to that if you are fakerbaker/leafy/afbl/gerbil/ frank/ whoever the fuck else shills as baker.

>>10740533

>To baker this is like the FOB Baker Recruitment Discussion Bread. Logical.

Exactly, off-general interaction between anons and bakers would only be a good thing

https://pastebin.com/NKAK5b9K

>>10740544

Still astounded that OSS is being called a shill

Your work and perspective speaks fore itself.

Very VERY Surprised shills dont attempt to pass off our bin in attempt to hijack identities.

https://pastebin.com/fTmHrBme

Linking so get ready for a shitstorm if they peek in and feel funny.

>>10740628

It does seems that I am the most shilled against baker, maybe it's just my persceptive, but it's been that way since I called out the endchan raid and caught another baker/bo working with a well known shill to make graphics in an attempt to subvert me.

Either way, I really don't want this thread to dereail into bitching about other bakers or shills. I want it be a place for communication and feedback from Anons.

>>10740692 You are oddly enough which is strange considering work ethic.

Was hit again and again when started even by yourself and was convinced for a short period of time you were on some shill shit also but was only so butthurt because I learned mostly from watching Wnb and with random bakes from yourself.

Absolutely understood.

The bread should be ghosted soon or so someone was tlaking about ghosting soon

Is this the official or Trial run?

Whoops There you go.

There is obviously an Op against you Veteran. Be Best. Be Blessed.

>>10740755

>Is this the official or Trial run?

I've asked that it be stickied, FJ usually stops by at some point and most likely will. We'll see how it goes.

>>10740777

o7

>>10740793

I've asked that it be stickied, FJ usually stops by at some point and most likely will. We'll see how it goes.

>Awesome 07

The more anon considers it the more anon considers the idea that Comms was an op for shills to learn how to bake.

Changing the notables or sections is the only thing they can do at this point because things are so well guarded as they need be apparently. . .

They will fail. As Usual. Godspeed Brethren.

Recently Bakers have been making changes to the dough without taking into consideration Anons thoughts. Bakers tend to congregate on /comms/ while the bulk of anons do not travel there. This can and has caused a disconnect between Bakers and Anons, which leads to mistrust and the opportunity for subversion and division.

I suggest instead of Bakers discussing bread changes and important decisions that affect all of /Qresearch/ be conducted here. I am going to ask that this bread be added to stickies and for anons to participate in the discussion. Issues that arise on /Qresearch/ should be done in the full view of Anons.

Issues such as bakers deleting notables

Changes to the dough

Hand off procedures=

Issues on the board

Shill tactics

And so on

''This is not a thread to thrash any one baker.''

Throwing this format out there.

Test Purple

Recently Bakers have been making changes to the dough without taking into consideration Anons thoughts. Bakers tend to congregate on /comms/ while the bulk of anons do not travel there. This can and has caused a disconnect between Bakers and Anons, which leads to mistrust and the opportunity for subversion and division.

''I suggest instead of Bakers discussing bread changes and important decisions that affect all of /Qresearch/ be conducted here. I am going to ask that this bread be added to stickies and for anons to participate in the discussion. Issues that arise on /Qresearch/ should be done in the full view of Anons.''

Issues such as bakers deleting notables

Changes to the dough

Hand off procedures=

Issues on the board

Shill tactics

And so on

''This is not a thread to thrash any one baker.''

>>10740960

I like this, I made a typo here

>>10740960

>I suggest instead of Bakers discussing bread changes and important decisions that affect all of /Qresearch/ be conducted here.

Q Just posted got it altogether incase of fucker thanks to awesome Capanons.

Purple.

Looks Good anon adding revision.

>>10741083 This shit is consistent with AFLB and others Lawd knows.

Q's Latest Posts

Tuesday 09.22.2020

>>10740908 ——————————————— Simple logic answers the question. (Cap: >>10740933)

>>10740970

Recently Bakers have been making changes to the dough without taking into consideration Anons thoughts. Bakers tend to congregate on /comms/ while the bulk of anons do not travel there. This can and has caused a disconnect between Bakers and Anons, which leads to mistrust and the opportunity for subversion and division.

I suggest Bakers discuss bread changes and important decisions that affect all of /Qresearch/ to be conducted here /Qresearch/ instead of /Comms/. I am going to ask that this bread be added to stickies and for anons to participate in the discussion. Issues that arise on /Qresearch/ should be done in the full view of Anons.

Issues such as bakers deleting notables

Changes to the dough

Hand off procedures=

Issues on the board

Shill tactics

And so on

''This is not a thread to thrash any one baker.''

**==It makes more sense to post here. No hassle linking from breads etc.

Purpley Ty Anon\

Recently Bakers have been making changes to the dough without taking into consideration Anons thoughts. Bakers tend to congregate on /comms/ while the bulk of anons do not travel there. This can and has caused a disconnect between Bakers and Anons, which leads to mistrust and the opportunity for subversion and division.

''I suggest Bakers discuss bread changes and important decisions that affect all of /Qresearch/ to be conducted here /Qresearch/ instead of /Comms/. I am going to ask that this bread be added to stickies and for anons to participate in the discussion. Issues that arise on /Qresearch/ should be done in the full view of Anons.''

Issues such as bakers deleting notables

Changes to the dough

Hand off procedures=

Issues on the board

Shill tactics

And so on

''This is not a thread to thrash any one baker.''

>>10741150

Yeah, I gave you the caps and the formatting ;)

>>10741181, >>10741186

WahahahaOf Course the most effective one for Space constraint!!

>>10740437

>>10740471

I taught myself baking as well.

Personally did not need 'classes'

but maybe some need more

hand-holding or coaching than others.

Shortage of capable bakers would have

been disaster so I saw no harm in the

classes.

>>10743139

>>10741296

>>10741156

>>10740919

>>10740755

I'm going to work on a Dough for this bread and repost it today. I don't want this bread to seem like an attack on bakers which my OP kinda does. I want this to be more like a lounge for bakers and anons to interact and discuss board issues. I want anons and bakers to think of it more like a lounge than any thing.

Basically anything that needs discussed but shouldn't take up space in the General Thread and isn't research or digs. If you guys have time/input into it please let me know

>>10744163

And please explain how it is the same or different from /comms/kitchen meta

so bakers know where to lurq

>>10744236

>And please explain how it is the same or different from /comms/kitchen meta

It should be similiar to that bread, but it is on QR general so Anons who don't participate will lurk and interact more.

>>10744370

> who don't participate there*

What are bakers' views on adding a notable that has already been notable?

Better to err on the side of adding again if important / different shift?

Better to keep notables list compact and fresh by omitting repetitions?

>>10745846

To me, it depends on the apparant importance of a notable really. I just try to use my own discretion. If it is a subject that I believe is exceeedlingly important I may notable a couple of different shifts.

>>10745919

That is my personal view as well.

BodyGoes 1 wai

Mind Another

''I Within This Forced Dissociation Culture.''

Poppin in; catching up, this right second.

>>10739179

The following are my thoughts. Only I have these thoughts. If another has the same thoughts, they are also unique and not mine:

From what I can see and tell reminds me of a saying one of my former bosses used to say. "Perception is 9/10ths of reality"

From what I can see regarding all this is as follows.

1. ABCU has perhaps the second worst PR plan in the world. It is only surpassed by the pot brigade PR plan. You cannot invade ANY platform and demand to be heard, to be liked or to be joined. Though I have no proof that those things specifically have happened, it is the vibe that is given off.

2. ABCU, whether they like it or not, is an ingredient of what all went on during the WR shit. Whether you/they were part of the WR antics is irrelevant. Point of fact is that for a while it became like trying to get to your boarding terminal filled with both Hari Krishna’s and Moonies. This again, just as it would in the real world, pisses off anons and they push back.

3. Being one of those ingredients may or may not have been intentional. It does not matter if you were or not. Perception is that you were as your recruitment drives were operating during the WR shit.

4. Those who are ‘with’ ABCU have the WORST case of tin ear I have ever seen. You cannot bring yourself to ever admit that you have done anything ‘wrong’. There is always a pushback, always a ‘your ass is wider’ argument, which then quickly devolves into name calling by all involved and ends with demands you, ABCU, return to Freerepublic.

5. Anons see the tin ear, which enforces the resistance when they go on their recruitment drives. Anons have been force fed and lied to forever. Many for years they had been trying to get the message of ‘we have been lied to’ out for far longer than the Q operation caught fire. You do not amuse them, in fact, you offend them.

6. ABCU refuses to accept that they are seen as part of the problem and in no way a solution. This goes back to the tin ear issue. While the truth, to you, may be in complete opposition to anything I have pointed out, the ‘TRUTH’ lies in what others perceive you as. What else pushes anons away from ABCU is the impression which is given and further, often said outright, that what THEY are doing is far more important than what QR is doing. Forgetting that its ABCU who is the parasite on the QR back. Anons see this as well and push back.

Any reference to anons is ment to be in a general way, any specific term such as I is ment to be specific.

>>10746661

I value your opinion.

But you have no sauce to back any of this up. Remember Q and the movement are suppose to based in facts. NOT OPINIONS. Its not what you know, Its what you can prove.

ABCU stated our goals and why the board exist we do not recruit we share ALL of our info with /qr/

We have no association with Free Republic. Only anons who want to talk shit say that.

I think you need to stop listening to shills and think on your own.

Stop by ABCU and see for yourself what it is about before jumping to conclusions.

The attack against us are done mainly by shills not anons.

ABCU has never name called anyone other than AFBL and crew.

>>10746661

>1. ABCU has perhaps the second worst PR plan in the world. It is only surpassed by the pot brigade PR plan. You cannot invade ANY platform and demand to be heard, to be liked or to be joined. Though I have no proof that those things specifically have happened, it is the vibe that is given off.

I think you do not understand the goal of ABCU.

Thanks for your input.

>2. ABCU, whether they like it or not, is an ingredient of what all went on during the WR shit. Whether you/they were part of the WR antics is irrelevant. Point of fact is that for a while it became like trying to get to your boarding terminal filled with both Hari Krishna’s and Moonies. This again, just as it would in the real world, pisses off anons and they push back.

I will agree that we got sucked into WR drama. But we only provided intel for Operations as stated. Intel that could be gained in other ways if they needed it. WR put the ABCU name on it when sharing with QR. this was not requested by ABCU team but done by WR (EC).

>3. Being one of those ingredients may or may not have been intentional. It does not matter if you were or not. Perception is that you were as your recruitment drives were operating during the WR shit.

We do not recruit on /qr/ we have videos and shit on twitter for recruiting.

If anon want to be part of ABCU all they have to do is stop by and speak up.

>4. Those who are ‘with’ ABCU have the WORST case of tin ear I have ever seen. You cannot bring yourself to ever admit that you have done anything ‘wrong’. There is always a pushback, always a ‘your ass is wider’ argument, which then quickly devolves into name calling by all involved and ends with demands you, ABCU, return to Freerepublic.

Stating again I and ABCU have no association with FreeRepublic.

>5. Anons see the tin ear, which enforces the resistance when they go on their recruitment drives. Anons have been force fed and lied to forever. Many for years they had been trying to get the message of ‘we have been lied to’ out for far longer than the Q operation caught fire. You do not amuse them, in fact, you offend them.

How anons feel when given truth and facts I could care less. We have never lied to anons or provided bad info. We prefer to let our info speak for its self.

>6. ABCU refuses to accept that they are seen as part of the problem and in no way a solution. This goes back to the tin ear issue. While the truth, to you, may be in complete opposition to anything I have pointed out, the ‘TRUTH’ lies in what others perceive you as. What else pushes anons away from ABCU is the impression which is given and further, often said outright, that what THEY are doing is far more important than what QR is doing. Forgetting that its ABCU who is the parasite on the QR back. Anons see this as well and push back.

This is where you are WRONG. The Truth has 1 answer.

We have never stated anything like what you claim. We have only claimed to be a support network for /qr/

> Any reference to anons is ment to be in a general way, any specific term such as I is ment to be specific.

Understood.

No hard feeling but check your facts before assuming things it just makes you look uninformed.

I am great at taking feedback so if you want to have a real conversation I am open but You just through baseless attacks and accusations

>>10747028

And the tin ear again raises its head and dances for everyone.

>>10747065

I guess a real conversation and back and fourth would be impossible.

Best of luck with spreading misinfo and lies. Remember Anons are smart. They will figure it out in time.

Im around if you ever decided to talk rather than just bash and give opinions without sauce for any of it.

>>10744163

Absolutely.

All this argument goes against the very layout of this thread therefore making you shills with your complaining in this manner. This Thread was developed for bakers to work out any confusions amongst them and develop a communication link close to the MAIN Threads for Anons and Newbies to stop by and check it out warming up to the idea of baking.

The Next bread better not have so much bullshit.

If you are bakers and unhappy with this Bread please feel free to migrate back to the other Meta Thanks Bakers here will undoubtedly stop by once this shit stops.

>>10747166

>I guess a real conversation and back and fourth would be impossible.

>

>Best of luck with spreading misinfo and lies. Remember Anons are smart. They will figure it out in time.

>

>Im around if you ever decided to talk rather than just bash and give opinions without sauce for any of it.

This is how a shill talks, not a badass super spy of the US government. End of story.

ITT shills shilling shills

>>10749428

Why do you attack me OSS? I defend you in QR general almost every time you bake as actual shills try to divide and attack you.

I did not bring any of this shit up. You guys did. I just commented on what was stated. To provide you with a more whole/complete picture.

I have never claimed to be a spy for the government. You are making shit up. I told you I do project management.

If you are thinking of SGT B. He almost never posted on the boards he did start our operations on 4/20 tho. And I am the voice for our unit. As stated several times I am a Civilian.

Your lack of understand of me and what I am doing is no reason to attack me or my board. We are all (I assume) on the same side working to expose the truth.

Infighting is no good and will solve nothing.

I also told you to remove us from the dough because WE (ABCU) have never asked or requested to be in the dough.

Someone added us and didnt even have the knowledge to call us by our proper name…

ABCU = American Broadcasting CommUnity

If you continue to attack me and my frens I will defend us because we have done nothing WRONG. If you think something we did that was incorrect please use specifics rather than just blanket attacks with no basis.

We do not partake in the division but instead preach unity and working together to achieve our goals.

>>10749682

>Why do you attack me OSS?

I didn't attack you, I pointed out the obvious. You talk like a shill talks.

>>10749682

>If you continue to attack me and my frens I will defend us because we have done nothing WRONG. If you think something we did that was incorrect please use specifics rather than just blanket attacks with no basis.

>

>We do not partake in the division but instead preach unity and working together to achieve our goals.

You spammed the board with copypasta for weeks/months. And you're threats don't scare me. If you want to not be called a shill, don't speak and act like one.

>I guess a real conversation and back and fourth would be impossible.

Also, in America it is spelled FORTH.

I would expect such an important discussion to focus on IDEAS, not on ad hominems concerning an anon's SPELLING. While we all enjoy teasing anons about their grammar on the main breads, that has no place in an important discussion about our future.

>>10750270

>While we all enjoy teasing anons about their grammar on the main breads, that has no place in an important discussion about our future.

Stop IP hopping.

>>10750270

>>10749778

>>10750339

Also, I think what the anon was pointing out is that /ABCU/ BO most likely spells color as colour

>>10750270

Spelling can be indicative of one's origin. Among other things.

I want to set this thread to cycle. Would you rather have numbered editions for archival purposes? Any other objections?

>>10751397

Hey BO, op (OSS) here.

https://pastebin.com/K89Fznh2

I would say cycle, but I am going to adjust the Dough at the top so there is no confusion in that it isn't meant to attack other bakers. As it stands now the way I type indicates infighting and that isn't the purpose.

>>10749778

>And you're threats don't scare me. If you want to not be called a shill, don't speak and act like one.

I have threatened no one.

All of you need to chill and think before you speak.

Saying I will defend ABCU and our frens is not a threat. Just a simple fact.

I hope you all have the balls to stand up for what you believe in as well.

Using words to try to talk to others in a civil manner, is in no way how shills handle things. I have not thrown any shade or said anything improper about anyone.

But seems like people want to throw mud at me and my board….

>>10750378

I am born and raised in the US. Currently living in CO but you would know this if you actually listened to others. Rather than just throwing blind accusations at others you dont know.

I told you more about me than most anons would.

All info I have provided is factual. If you have issues with that, that sounds like a personal issue and not a board issue.

Im on QR almost all day providing you solid digs and info. If you dont like I am sorry. Typically I do not bring any attention to myself other anons do.

>>10750270

As would I but this thread just seems like an ATTACK /abcu/ thread.

>>10751397

>>10751451

Can you adjust the OP to the following or should we just scrap this one and start a new one?

Welcome to Q Research Kitchen Meta

This bread was created as place for both Bakers and Anons to communicate away from Q Research General about all things Q Research that should not be in the General Bread.

Issues such as..

Bakers deleting notables after the bake

Changes to the dough

Hand off procedures

Issues on the board

Shill tactics

And so on

This is not a thread to thrash any one baker.

Open lines of communication only further unity among us. The hopes are that this bread will lead to more Anons learning to bake, sharing tips and tricks, and general comradery that isn't appropriate in the general research thread. A lounge for general discussion if you will.

>>10751397

Awesome.

>>10751451

What you are going from sounds right.

>>10738967

Anyone see that Lighter on the table?

You know that butane lighter burned that kitchen.

Independently from everything else it set ablaze the kitchen swiftly.

Ban Butane Lighters.

Butane Lighters Start Kitchen Fires.

Butane Lighter Safety Matters.

Probably a pot taker…

>>10752055

Only an autist would notice this, kek

>>10752055, >>10752107

That IS nice to see. It appears to be a normal anon.

oh and it is even sticky.

Ask the BO to make it cycl- oh he's already asked.

Sweet. Thank you OSS o7, Thank you BO o7

>>>/doughlist/102

>>10752316

o7 KB

Bakers are gatekeepers.

Please review Qs latest post regarding gatekeepers.

"Everything posted has meaning."

Q team is clearly well aware of this but isn't choosing to directly engage or out them as shills.

This could be perceived and misconstrued as "divisionfagging" so for the sake of optics they are allowing anons to see for themselves.

Anons are "NAMELESS, FAMELESS" Qs own words - yet now we have a group of namefag famefag bakers typing in ebonics deliberately making the board incredulous and only handing off dough to their clown friends who post here 24/7/365.

Anons needed to see for themselves this contrast, and to fully reach their own conclusions regarding just how much effort is made to suppress certain information from making it into notables.

These same clowns also attack anons and ridicule certain nominations in order to prevent them from being discussed.

The bakers union clowns started using identities as a means to inject authority into determining what is allowed to be discussed and what isn't.

The namefag clowns spend their entire day here, day after day every single day giving each other digital fellatio in order to create the optics of consent that the anons actually approve of them breaking all "Anon protocols".

90%+ of all TYB posts are inorganic and used as a means to garner tacit approval.

Remember, the BO said 80% of bakers are shills controlling certain narratives.

80% is a fair estimate, but it's likely more.

Just have a look through the entire history of the aliens, ufo, advanced technology threads on here.

The baker gatekeepers there have spent nearly three years in a ruthless campaign to control absolutely all information and thought regarding extraterrestrials.

The most heavily shilled and controlled threads on this board.

Goddamn I feel like these shill bakers are trying so hard for Q to say some shit on it but they need to just fuck off and stop sucking soros fucking cock.

Baker handed off, and every baker just about showed up at once. Or did they ever leave?

>>10739043

Got some sauce the BO of QRmemes has anything to do with endchan?

9/23/20 11:10 am EDT Ghostbaker2 13765

I have requested the board owner delete this thread and sticky the new one I just created.

Welcome to Q Research Kitchen Meta

>>10756139

>>10756139

>>10756139

>>10756139

>>10755309

Saw that one too, little things.

>>10756209

Board has been overrun by shill copypasta threads lately.

Recommend IP banning the shills posting them.

Afterall, IP banning is the digital warfare equivilant to executing an enemy soldier. You only win wars by being as viscious to your enemy as possible.

>>10738967

I'm all for this shit. Great I'd OP

>>10765679, >>10765694 Wtf… Parked Uhaul packed with supplies and signs for the rioters..

>>10766060

>>10766082

>>10766093

>>10766090

>>10766098

>>10765604

>>10765597

>>10765589

>>10765559

>>10765547

>>10765528

>>10765523

>>10766129

>>10766135

>>10766147

OFF BREAD

'78

>>10766147

>>10766060

>>10766082

>>10766093

>>10766090

>>10766098

>>10765604

>>10765597

>>10765589

>>10765559

>>10765547

>>10765528

>>10765523

>>10766090

>>10766060

>>10765587

>>10765570

>>10765523

>>10765516

>>10765492

'77

>>10765189

>>10765147

>>10765177

>>10765189

>>10765210

>>10765223

>>10765232

>>10765259

>>10765265

>>10765280

>>10765289

>>10765293

>>10765305

>>10765327

>>10765347

>>10765359

>>10765378

>>10765380

>>10765382

>>10765389

>>10765420

>>10765429

>>10765435

>>10765445

>>10765439

>>10765460

>>10765473

>>10765475

ALL OFF BREAD IN NUMERICAL ORDER

>>10765147

>>10765177

>>10765189

>>10765189

>>10765210

>>10765223

>>10765232

>>10765259

>>10765265

>>10765280

>>10765289

>>10765293

>>10765305

>>10765327

>>10765347

>>10765359

>>10765378

>>10765380

>>10765382

>>10765389

>>10765420

>>10765429

>>10765435

>>10765439

>>10765445

>>10765460

>>10765473

>>10765475

>>10765492

>>10765516

>>10765523

>>10765523

>>10765528

>>10765547

>>10765559

>>10765570

>>10765587

>>10765589

>>10765597

>>10765604

>>10766060

>>10766060

>>10766082

>>10766090

>>10766090

>>10766093

>>10766098

>>10766129

>>10766147

>>10757377

Where can we do some serious business?

>>10767305

Question: Can Divorce settlements won by a spouse be payment to a female person and be laundered monies from a TRUST or Land Sale Trust? [Focused]

>>10767314

What if a payoff was made to a person and the money was used to actually service and industry … What if all connections we acts, all made up to look like they were real, but staged? And related to [CORONAVIRUS][ADC][HT] and the production of OXIDES to make addiction to situations? Illusions or reality? It happened… it's real and it's a damn about to burst… WIDE OPEN.