>>10746661
I value your opinion.
But you have no sauce to back any of this up. Remember Q and the movement are suppose to based in facts. NOT OPINIONS. Its not what you know, Its what you can prove.
ABCU stated our goals and why the board exist we do not recruit we share ALL of our info with /qr/
We have no association with Free Republic. Only anons who want to talk shit say that.
I think you need to stop listening to shills and think on your own.
Stop by ABCU and see for yourself what it is about before jumping to conclusions.
The attack against us are done mainly by shills not anons.
ABCU has never name called anyone other than AFBL and crew.
>>10746661
>1. ABCU has perhaps the second worst PR plan in the world. It is only surpassed by the pot brigade PR plan. You cannot invade ANY platform and demand to be heard, to be liked or to be joined. Though I have no proof that those things specifically have happened, it is the vibe that is given off.
I think you do not understand the goal of ABCU.
Thanks for your input.
>2. ABCU, whether they like it or not, is an ingredient of what all went on during the WR shit. Whether you/they were part of the WR antics is irrelevant. Point of fact is that for a while it became like trying to get to your boarding terminal filled with both Hari Krishna’s and Moonies. This again, just as it would in the real world, pisses off anons and they push back.
I will agree that we got sucked into WR drama. But we only provided intel for Operations as stated. Intel that could be gained in other ways if they needed it. WR put the ABCU name on it when sharing with QR. this was not requested by ABCU team but done by WR (EC).
>3. Being one of those ingredients may or may not have been intentional. It does not matter if you were or not. Perception is that you were as your recruitment drives were operating during the WR shit.
We do not recruit on /qr/ we have videos and shit on twitter for recruiting.
If anon want to be part of ABCU all they have to do is stop by and speak up.
>4. Those who are ‘with’ ABCU have the WORST case of tin ear I have ever seen. You cannot bring yourself to ever admit that you have done anything ‘wrong’. There is always a pushback, always a ‘your ass is wider’ argument, which then quickly devolves into name calling by all involved and ends with demands you, ABCU, return to Freerepublic.
Stating again I and ABCU have no association with FreeRepublic.
>5. Anons see the tin ear, which enforces the resistance when they go on their recruitment drives. Anons have been force fed and lied to forever. Many for years they had been trying to get the message of ‘we have been lied to’ out for far longer than the Q operation caught fire. You do not amuse them, in fact, you offend them.
How anons feel when given truth and facts I could care less. We have never lied to anons or provided bad info. We prefer to let our info speak for its self.
>6. ABCU refuses to accept that they are seen as part of the problem and in no way a solution. This goes back to the tin ear issue. While the truth, to you, may be in complete opposition to anything I have pointed out, the ‘TRUTH’ lies in what others perceive you as. What else pushes anons away from ABCU is the impression which is given and further, often said outright, that what THEY are doing is far more important than what QR is doing. Forgetting that its ABCU who is the parasite on the QR back. Anons see this as well and push back.
This is where you are WRONG. The Truth has 1 answer.
We have never stated anything like what you claim. We have only claimed to be a support network for /qr/
> Any reference to anons is ment to be in a general way, any specific term such as I is ment to be specific.
Understood.
No hard feeling but check your facts before assuming things it just makes you look uninformed.
I am great at taking feedback so if you want to have a real conversation I am open but You just through baseless attacks and accusations