This video is interesting
John Basham 🇺🇲 Retweeted
Jerome Taylor@JeromeTaylor
Looks like Chinese troops are practising abseiling onto the roof of Hong Kong’s exhibition centre tonight.
Helicopters have been buzzing in and out all afternoon.
This was the second abseiling we’ve seen today.
Drills ahead of Oct 1 National Day?
Can’t download videos on iPhone
https://twitter.com/JeromeTaylor/status/1308742863098769409?s=20
https://twitter.com/JeromeTaylor/status/1308742863098769409?s=20
Things are heating up WW
https://twitter.com/anewscomtr/status/1308843751784230912?s=20
I found the youtube video, China in Hong Kong
Grand Juries take time
https://twitter.com/RT93609537/status/1308960358896369666?s=20
So anons the happenings so far this week, that we’re reported to come
Release of Hunter Biden Report
Report by Grassley about Ciaramella
I’m brain dead what else happened that’s big this week relating to Justice? We still have today and tomorrow, and Saturday
Top FDA vaccine adviser recuses herself over tie to Moderna
report Both Moderna and Pfizer began trials for the vaccine this summer
Sam Dorman13 hours ago
A top adviser has resigned from the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) vaccine advisory committee amid concerns about her ties to a pharmaceutical company conducting a trial for the highly anticipated treatment.
Last year, Baylor University professor Hana El Sahly became chairwoman of the FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, which will make nonbinding recommendations to the government on vaccine approval. In July, she was chosen to co-lead Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine trial, which is competing with another trial from Pfizer.
A Baylor spokeswoman confirmed the recusal to Reuters on Wednesday.
Both Moderna and Pfizer began trials for the vaccine this summer, although it's unclear how quickly the FDA will be able to approve a product.
FAUCI 'CAUTIOUSLY OPTIMISTIC' ABOUT CORONAVIRUS VACCINE APPROVAL BY END OF 2020
The committee is expected to meet on Oct. 22 in order to discuss progress on vaccine development. Earlier this month, the FDA released a statement emphasizing its commitment to regulatory independence.
"The FDA is often held up as the 'gold standard' of regulatory agencies around the globe," a statement from agency officials read. "What’s at the core of these standards are the agency’s regulatory independence and science-based decision-making. As with all products we regulate, we will follow the science and data in our decision making regarding COVID-19 vaccines. It is because the FDA is a science-based agency that we say this with the clarity of conviction."
News of Sahly's departure came just a day after The Washington Post reported that the FDA was expected to announce higher standards for vaccine trials
Odd timing, her leaving because of higher standards
Two individuals familiar with the issue said the FDA will ask manufacturers to follow clinical trial participants for at least two months in order to obtain an emergency authorization.
Additionally, trials will have to show evidence surrounding more severe cases and older people, making it unlikely that a vaccine will be finished before the 2020 presidential election. The enrollment process took about a month with a second round of shots being administered after three or four weeks in the trial.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/hana-sahly-vaccine-adviser-resign-covid
Oh yeah POTUS left the briefing to take an emergency call two days ago, or yesterday! Times flies
God that’s funny, “debate prep”, these people are delusional or disinfo . I laughed a lot after reading that
The media obsession with Q, is not working, they know it so they try harder. That’s the problem when journalists actually abandon journalism. They think all the BS people have bought for 50 years is still working, but there’s too many millions around the world who have woken up way before they started hammering hard.
The day MSM finally goes down a chorus of millions of angels will be seen singing in the clouds and all souls of God, Will Be FREE
Makes sense
I agree McCarthy has no fire and his voice always sounds pleading. I hope he’s got the goods to make things happen. I’d rather see Jim Jordan in his position
I believe an anon revealed and discussed this same thing on night shift a couple of months ago
This Radical 1960s Movement In India Helps Explain Antifa Today
It is important for Americans, especially Republican lawmakers, to understand and study the Naxalite movement, as it provides a template to understand what is happening now.
By Sumantra Maitra
FBI Director Chris Wray recently explained in detail threats to the republic from a range of subversive forces, from purposefully vague terms like “Russian efforts to influence American domestic polity” to leaderless but growing white supremacist movements. One thing stood out. Wray claimed the Antifa network is an ideology, not an organization, and therefore cannot be designated as a terror group. That goes against the wishes of his own boss, the president of the United States.
Now, it is understandable that the FBI cannot, by law, police ideologies. American law doesn’t allow government agencies to designate ideologies as destructive, as long as they do not promote active violence. In that way, it is different than Europe.
Germany, for example, can ban Nazi books, and Poland and Hungary can ban communism. But in the United States, ideas may be freely propagated, unless there’s actual violence. “We don’t really think of threats in terms of left, right at the FBI. We’re focused on the violence, not the ideology,” Wray noted.
The FBI accordingly has undertaken an investigation into individual actors who encourage or participate in violence but is apparently incapable of tackling Antifa as an organization. As the Associated Press reported, Wray said Antifa “is not a group or an organization. It’s a movement or an ideology.”
This is a flawed way to understand Antifa, as well as the threat it poses. It is easy to dismiss Antifa as a movement, not an organization, and therefore not subversive enough to threaten the existence of the republic. To do so is also historically flawed. Another movement, very similar in character, can provide a template to understand how Antifa operates and what it seeks. To understand Antifa, one needs to know about the Naxalite movement of the late 1960s.
Let’s Jot Over to India for a Bit
Communism was once a minor social force in pre-independence-India, jumpstarted among Cambridge University-educated upper-middle-class students during the colonial British period. This helps explain why it never was popular among the common people.
During the British period, socially successful Indians were all upper-middle-class and above, those who were either from princely or land-owning families or who had an educated background. They were the ones who worked in the imperial civil service, law, and other professional fields.
After all, Britain was a tiny country that ruled all over the world, and a significant majority of the local population supported and ran the empire. Stories of them are not told anymore because it would ruin the narrative of an evil colonial power exploiting lands faraway.
Of these people, who could afford to visit Britain for training and scholarship, a tiny subset was radicalized in Cambridge, a historically Marxist-dominated university. They then went back to India to start the vanguard party and lead the working class to revolution. They were not successful. The communist movement splintered into various factions, as communism is wont to do, and from that, the Communist Party of India was born.
https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/24/this-radical-1960s-movement-in-india-helps-explain-antifa-today/
Ok another journalist saying a lot going on now. Could it be Venezuela
https://twitter.com/charliespiering/status/1308793676085297152?s=20
POTUS knows and tells HRC gave out secrets
https://twitter.com/charliespiering/status/1308169450621992966?s=20
Trump team suspected Mueller cognitive decline
By Byron York
September 23, 2020 - 8:45 PM
The political world was stunned on July 24, 2019, when Trump-Russia special counsel Robert Mueller testified before the House and Senate. It was not anything Mueller said that shocked observers — it was his demeanor. The 74-year-old special counsel appeared confused at times. He sometimes had difficulty answering the most basic questions. He had difficulty forming complex sentences.
The Mueller at the witness table was a far cry from the Mueller who took over the FBI 18 years earlier. Colleagues remembered a man who was super sharp, on top of everything, a micromanager. Now, many of those watching were concerned.
"This is delicate to say," former Obama aide David Axelrod tweeted, "but Mueller, whom I deeply respect, has not publicly testified before Congress in at least six years. And he does not appear as sharp as he was then."
Fox News's Chris Wallace was more blunt: "I think it's been a disaster for the Democrats," he said, "and I think it's been a disaster for the reputation of Robert Mueller."
Twitter buzzed with talk about Mueller. But President Trump's legal team was not surprised.
More than a year earlier, at a meeting in April 2018,the president's lawyers had gotten a disturbing look at Mueller's conditionAnd even before that, they had cause to be concerned about Mueller's possible cognitive issues and what those problems might mean for the special counsel investigation.
The meeting took place on April 24, 2018. Rudy Giuliani had just joined Trump's defense team. Attorney John Dowd had left the team, and two other white-collar defense lawyers, Jane and Marty Raskin, had joined. Given all those changes, it was decided that the new lineup should have a get-acquainted meeting with the Mueller team.
After opening niceties, the conversation turned to a number of legal topics and specifically to the longstanding opinion from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel that a sitting president cannot be indicted. It was not an obscure or arcane issue. It was, in fact, perhaps the key legal question in the entire special counsel investigation. But Mueller could not recall it. The old Mueller, of course, would have known all about it. But on that day in April, the Mueller at the meeting could not remember. It was, to say the least, extraordinary that he could not discuss something so basic to the case.
"Bob said, 'I'll have to get back to you on that,'" recalled Giuliani, "and it was apparent that he didn't know what we were talking about." A Mueller staffer stepped in to cover for the special counsel, assuring the Trump team that the prosecutors knew about the issue and would get back to them. "There were a couple of other little facts that came up — it didn't seem like he knew about them," Giuliani remembered, "and [Mueller’s staff] would lean over and tell him."
That was the only time Giuliani ever met with Mueller face-to-face. Afterward, "I had no more contact with him," Giuliani said. "None of us did until it was over." Lawyer Jane Raskin, who was also in the meeting, had the same experience. "After that, we never met with Mueller, and we never spoke with him on the phone," Raskin recalled. "It was all Jim Quarles and Andrew Goldstein" — two of Mueller's senior prosecutors.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/trump-team-suspected-mueller-cognitive-decline?_amp=true&__twitter_impression=true
BTW add this to the list of politicians etc claiming cognitive decline. Body language ghost did a video on Mueller and she said he was faking, or not in cognitive decline