>>1077085 (last bread)
Many of these seats with no Republican running are in places like Massachusetts, California, etc..
What people tend to forget is that, if all goes to plan, many Democrats who are currently running will not be eligible to serve. I hear people complaining and whining about how "slow" things seem to be going. They're like a bunch of temper tantrum throwing toddlers screeching "We want a perp walk". Apparently they don't understand how elections work and the strategy behind them. Ever hear of the term "October Surprise"? Why do campaigns keep the most destructive info about a candidate to drop it in late September/early October? It's not only about the info but the fact that the opposing party can't replace their damaged candidate on the ballot. Most states do not allow the ballots to be changed after (varies by state) 30-45 days before the election. Write in campaigns seldom work and seeing the disgraced douchbag's name on the ballot turns off people to that candidates party downballot. If the douchebag happens to win, say because they're Leftards and their fellow Leftards will vote for them like the lemmings they are, the douchebag won't be able to serve. Depending on the state the governor can appoint someone or the seat stays vacant until a special election is held. The key is the douchebag is gone and whatever power and leverage goes with them. Think of all the power and leverage would be lost if the above happened to Nancy Pelosi, Chuckles Schumer or Adam Schiff.
Strategy, tactics and patience, grasshoppers.