lb notables >>10831968, >>10831989, >>10832016 Anon on Flynn investigation: Jan 3, 4, 5 2017 are critical days

crucial to it all- why did strzok reopen before wh mtg, too many present at wh to cover up so i assume reports of jan 5th accurate. who gave PS order to reopen (likely on the 3rd or early 4th- he would do it quickly, what did potus know– CLAS intel?

i am thinking at this point the WH mtg was the public predicate for optics and to keep it official gov biz by elected/nommed people not IC, DS. But we can assume it was coordinated by DS before, WH mtg was a front.

'I do wonder if at WH mtg it was important to tell cabinet that it was an ongoing investigation vs a new investigation (or a re-opening). Why the urgency to reopen it before WH mtg, ?( participants were freaked, so this matters, knowing it'was a reopened investigation would make them freak moar if they assumed it was ongoing- so that may explain why PS reopened before- yet to be determined by me

PS seems to be arguing dates to pretend predicate to reopen was WH mtg, interdasting because if the goal was to tell WH mtg peops it was ongoing that shows major manipulation- goal for public optics of wh mtg predicating AND goal of manipulating wh mtg peops that it was ongoing- DS fuggery where they got snagged?

important dig.quick read helps >>10828543

remember big pic also.

>>10833053

Theory from last nite with BIG PIC stuff.

remember delegate recount scam, Q 36 and SC opinion 7-7-20 told us true!

When it failed they closed MF case, MF was set up for it.

Then they reopened case for insurance policy #2 SCO but that would have been thought of later because of they planned it before, why close out MF?

pb notable >>10828543

>>10833053

The topic that MF was reopened on Jan 4, 2017 will counter PS narrative that the WH ordered it reopened and break the fake narrative. DS based on PS claim of altered dates seems to be relying on convincing public it was not opened or re-opened before WH mtg. BUSTED?

>>10833059

I still cannot see it habbening, and if it does it will convince me moar that it is a movie and panic of them also.

I would say he will start very presidential, to show his matutrity, development (diplomacy), and to sway many whos only criticism is his attacks on people.

I do think he will want to smear and expose Joe and make him lose his cool, so any attacks on Potus will be first defended with facts, and second countered with public known specifics.

I can see a tactic whereby Potus starts diplomatic and asks Joe to recall or justify his past actions as to have him ramble and confuse him.

I think Wallace can make or break Joe and may intervene to not shelter Joe from answering Potus direct questions and/or allegations. A strong moderator on topics only with no side talk or going off Wallaces topics, we will see.

With Joe though, that may work in his favoe because his ego will make him want to defend and he may go after Wallace also.

I still would be amazed if it habbens though, If so I am glad I did not bet because I gave it a 10% chance or under.