>The thing I can't wrap my head around is if it is possible Q allows them and the shit they pull because every army needs an enemy.
If this is true, and Q found it useful to waste the time of us anons with very little left… I will never forgive anyone involved. That would be like marching us through a known minefield, just too keep the survivors on their toes.
>>10929094 In this case, it would be like having a mine clearing tank, and not using it. Unforgivable, in any case.
>>10929114 That's far different from the OP's point. And mine.
If we have to sacrifice those who have the least to gain from this battle (planting trees we can never hope to see the shade from), yet are among the most loyal… just to keep others (with much to gain) motivated… we aren't winning. We aren't even close.
I refuse to believe Q+ would allow it.