Fresh for night shift. I posted a draft earlier and got a little traction. Different times, different audience. I think it bears repeating given the remarks it did get.
Original post (all pb):
>>10986889 in response to:
>>10981038 It's this SOB started it all.
>until after the election.
I gave that very serious consideration. Ran it past a couple atty's and we decided to go with it as it had long been in the public domain.
Just like the "Usual Suspects", it's all from 2 or more open sources so if analysis has not yet caught up with disclosure, who's really to blame?
I believe this strengthens Q's hand as it sows horror into the heart of the cabal, gives us the same absolution as they demand of their satanic deeds and provides many Q "proofs", if even by inference and supposition.
>There must be more 'sauces' then inteltoday.org?
Read the whole thread, many links.
>>10986889