>>10993426 (pb)
Fwiw, the screen cap says the litigants were going forward "pro se" (representing themselves). For some reason this seems to be the case pretty often. People cannot get success using lawyers in some cases.
I've read of this with family court cases where people having their children "legally" kidnapped by the state don't get effective representation and seem to end up better off representing themselves.
This psalm seems very timely today. I hope it encourages anons.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm%2043&version=NIV
Interesting triple dubs there.
In any case, I have a question about Brennan. Does he have a connection to letting 911 "hijackers" into the country?
https://freedomoutpost.com/treasonous-john-brennan-bombshell-he-was-chief-of-cia-station-in-saudi-arabia-at-time-9-11-hijackers-had-visas-approved/
A quick look didn't yield an online version, but have any anons seen the C_A ads in the WSJ?
Just seemed interesting to me that they are hiring right now.