THE PEOPLE STAND UNITED!
Paul Sperry is jumping the shark.
Axios, a FAKE NEWS OUTLET, publishes a story:
https://www.axios.com/barr-durham-report-election-3c02ec6a-7613-4083-b35c-4844de6da16b.html
that Durham and Barr have allegedly leaked that there won't be any indictments before the election.
And who are Axios' sources?
"Attorney General Bill Barr has begun telling top Republicans that the Justice Department’s sweeping review into the origins of the Russia investigation will not be released before the election, a senior White House official and a congressional aide briefed on the conversations tell Axios."
Unnamed sources and neither are Durham or Barr!
Sperry proceeds to TREAT THIS AS PROOF:
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1314615045079343106
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1314640431498571778
Sperry also proceeds to ATTACK Durham and Barr:
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1314618312706469889
"As I long suspected, Barr and Durham took a dive".
More concernfag meltdowns:
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1314618901846777859
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1314619190821752833
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1314620310554054663
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1314623239918964740
"Barr delivered a gut punch".
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1314625225393344514
"AG Barr buckled."
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1314627019167141890
"All talk, no action"
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1314635206700290050
ATTRIBUTES A FALSE QUOTE TO BARR:
"Sorry, I couldn't really do anything about it".
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1314636093812285441
"Pathetic"
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1314639997207748611
"Punt"
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1314615754021625865
FALSELY MISQUOTES POTUS by changing "IF Axios story is true, then disappointed…" to "is disappointed":
"Trump said he is "disappointed" Barr is holding back release of Durham report or announcement of possible indictments before the election:"
ALL SPERRY HAS AT THIS POINT IS THE FAKE NEWS OUTLET AXIOS CLAIMING WHAT A 'SENIOR WH OFFICIAL' AND 'CONGRESSIONAL AIDE' TOLD THEM. THAT'S IT. SPERRY'S ONLY SOURCE IS FAKE NEWS AXIOS.
If this wasn't bad enough, Sperry then totally jumps the shark. As further 'evidence' the story is true, he cites…AN EX-CIA AGENT WHO IS MERELY ECHOING AXIOS' NARRATIVE:
https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1314378743226531840
And then Sperry cites fake news outlet WSJ as "confirming" the narrative:
https://archive.is/oFBtr
And who is the source to the WSJ?
"according to people familiar with the matter."
ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME SPERRY?
YOU HAVE UNNAMED SOURCES THROUGH AND THROUGH.
You have Axios claiming a 'Senior WH official' and 'Congressional Aide' have the knowledge.
You have an ex-CIA agent parroting Axios.
You have WSJ citing 'people familiar with the matter'.
WAKE THE FUCK UP SPERRY AND DON'T BELEIVE EVERYTHING YOU READ!
The way I see it, Sperry can be right and catastrophically wrong, in this case I think he is wasting the 21 retweet gift he was given, and besmirching POTUS' image by calling into question his judgment of good journalists.
Sperry is insulting Barr and Durham with nothing more than unnamed sources.
You tell me what 'method' you see in this.
Now you're just pushing the narrative that what Sperry said is true, which means you're accepting 'people familiar with the matter' by implication.
Try harder.
Satanists BTFO