Anonymous ID: ed501f Oct. 11, 2020, 10:16 p.m. No.11034166   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4226 >>6634 >>9572

I hereby make a claim of /comms/baker subversion

this claim is the foundational reason for the splitting of the bread saturday 10/3

the bread was split for the reason of:

Violation of First Principles

 

First Principle Violated:

-anons not allowed to bake as anon

 

Example 1 of Ongoing Issue

/comms/bakers refuse to handoff to anons

4 /comms/bakers involved in this example (4 unique UID's)

pic related includes 3 of these bakers

would have included 4th but pic related getting too large to digest

 

Bread #13946

/comms/bakers refuse to handoff to anons

anon wasfirst to offerto take bake

/comms/baker 'be' refuses to pass without qbin pre-verification

/comms/bakers proceed to defend brand new baker hand-off pre-verification procedure that was created by these same /comms/bakers

/comms/bakers require anon to selfdox/namefag in order to bake

 

since when are anons not allowed to bake as anon?

 

pic very related

 

input from anons requested

how does this look to you anons?

easy to understand?

is everything sauced?

UIDs → /comms/baker ID's

too big? (what should be removed?)

 

At least 2 more examples of the above are being sauced and proofed

will post when done

 

thank you for (you)r consideration

o7

Anonymous ID: ed501f Oct. 12, 2020, 11:26 p.m. No.11048160   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9269

>>11048110

>BO either doesn't care or is complicit

BO stickied this thread

and BO has been locking the unfinished /comms/ duplicate breads

thats all I need to know

as to "solving" this

anons will solve it for theselves

its called personal responsibility

grow some