These are not active but the contents of each post is contained along with the id of said poster.
They all can be checked so just grab one…you pick it and can verify for yourself.
This is what started all this and are direct links not poorly made and unrreadable graphics
Addition to Dough on Sunday Added into bred #13839
OSS and the created persona(s) is/are baker
OP
>>10812955 14:20:21 ts
>Anons, baker puts forth suggestion to add /Qresearch/ Meta to dough in this location. It only take one anons to agree to change as was demonstrated last night. ***
This thread was created by OSS and is populated with the very same panels of mostly innuendo and assumptions that get posted in general when they have a wild hair up their ass (unfortunately that frequency has increased) What it really shows, if you can get passed the presentation, is a poor process of adding things to the dough and the myriad of problems all bakers face in doing so.. some communication based and some just plain not understanding. Is there something there? perhaps but it is nowhere near the level it is and has been presented by OSS. OSS has decided to take whatever miss-understandings or confusion about some of the process as a personal attack. This includes several bakers now but started with one and has gone on since March of this year.
Here is what habbened-links provided and not panels that tell one side
>>10812968, >>10812989 first and second yes vote(s)
>Go crazy. I'll agree with ya 33c95f (7)
>Seconded. Fair is fair. 4d997b (3)
>>10812996 first no vote 70e584 (6)
>Don't care about first
>NO to Q Research General Dough/Kitchen Mea
>>10813002 third yes vote b83db2 (12)
>Loud and Clear Dubs confirm.
>>10813005 at this post, by the baker, the entire voting process is over
>>10812968, >>10812955, >>10812989
Nomination, Seconded, and confirmed. /QResearch/ META will be added to dough 03cc3a (25)
>>10813078 14:31:36 Vote NO to qresearch general dough/kitchen mea 70e584 (6)
second no vote after the voting "process" has already been called closed (at 14:25:16) see 10813005 with a vote yes and a confirmation from another. Effectively this process was decided upon by OSS and two others before many even had the time to cast a vote or know what this was all about.
>>10813024 anon who voted no is stating the process was closed after 5 minutes 14:27:09 70e584 (6)
I am not even involved with this yet
Baker post @ 14:31:24
>>10813074 ADDING THIS TO GLOBAL NOTABLES SO THERE IS NO ARGUMENT/CONFUSION OVER ADDITION 03cc3a (25)
At this point 11 minutes have elapsed but the baker had already closed it at 14:25:16 with this post >>10813005
>>10813037 Baker presents this @ 14:28:20
>And you can thank Cee for adding something with only 1 vote for last night. *** OSS has already stated it takes only one vote to include based on his statement of another (wrong) instance that habbened last night So the old, tired excuse of "someone else did this so now I can" is used as the basis to force this through with the one no vote being pushed aside and the yes votes counted.
>>10813086 This is where I join 14:31:53
>WTF does that have to do with it?, So someone else does it and it's ok??, Give it moar time
I do not vote and want the time given for all to assess and participate
>>10813194 this is tagged to my post 14:39:18
>ya, moar time - thru next bread 8002b4 (2)
>>10813269 and then this
>anons want more time to weigh in on this - thru nb
>>10813194, >>10813086, >>10813005 Nomination, Seconded, and confirmed. /QResearch/ META will be added to dough
>not notable
and it is a reply to the bun that already has 005 placed in it for global
a total of 24m21 seconds have elapsed at this point but the baker , in a later bred presented that the dough had plenty of time to run and it was "voted on". It was over at >>10813005 14:25:16 and as a reminder a grand total of 495 seconds have elapsed by this point
>>10813280 bakers response to >>10813269 wrongly assuming that this poster is gb
>>10813301 OSS is corrected
This is just another example of OSS creating these problems by assuming the identity of someone who is calling out this process for what it is-a total set-up.
>>10813289 And to punctuate this even AFLB gets this
This entire thing smells as bad as the friction it has created because of the incessant spamming of that material in here since March. I will not claim to know the entire story simply because I don't care for it any longer-it is tired, old and worn out. They made that decision for all of you in under 5 minutes and on a handful of votes >>10813005
If a proper vote is done and it is voted in or out, this entire thing gets solved and dropped but the set-up and ramrod of this by the very baker who created that thread is not a true reflection of this community. It is the reflection of a 5 minute process and a baker with an agenda