>>11034605

hello baker, hope you are well

looking at notes, everything looking good

these aren't part of notes, right?

>>11034228 still funny

>>11034536 I love Adm.Rogers, ty

>>11034569 Is this better?

The global notable is no good, baker.

>>11014548 A case against the /COMMS/ Bakers - New bread created to document the subversion

Please remove, even if OSS puts it back again. It is just an opinion. And he won't allow any anon to voice another opinion. Shills will probably not agree but then - that's why we call them shills!

o7

>>11034688

>Oss will go nuclear

Well, your version is better of course.

But globals are for announcements that would be of interest to all anons.

But why be agraid of him?

He is just one anon.

There is no joy on this board anymore.

>>11034756

why do you call another anon garbage

unless you are a shill?

>>11034764

>shill bakers

plz anon

be specific when you say things about anons, bakers or really - anybody

so many non-specifc, general claims about bakers on this board that are not sauced

when i look closely, very few have merit

just "throw shit at the wall and see if some sticks" stuff

and i did look closely

anons used to challenge sauceless charges

or ignore them

now we let bullies force them down our throats

who will change this?