https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump
go look yourself, non-believers.
I was once was one ,too…a doubter….but then…I found the R/T
scroll down to Oct 12
>Then just post the link. That's how it works here. Otherwise it's just a photoshop.
it has been posted over a dozen times the last two breads
https://twitter.com/The171111/status/1315681655756066822
it is going to show up in the 171111 status because it's a retweet!
you just lazy!!!
>That's how it works here
i don't think you know how anything works and are too lazy to go figure it out.
people like you spend their lives wondering why they get left behind and nothing good happens for them or to them.
>Still can't post the link gays? Look seriously, you're gonna have to up your game here.
have you been to Trump's twitter feed?
Have you been there and scrolled down?
if not, why not?
if so, are you blind?
the shills here need a big fat juicy kiss
Gov nips Cuomo is on CNN with AC
nobody wants the vaccine…no clapping
>if POTUS ever said "no homo" …
>https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/barr-unmasking-review-no-charges/2020/10/13/0f63fd2e-0d67-11eb-8074-0e943a91bf08_story.html#click=https://t.co/FO5vrnucy9
behind paywall….
what does it say?
anon sources or names?
>BREAKING: Unmasking report concludes without charges or report
this is the second time round for this story!
>https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/barr-unmasking-review-no-charges/2020/10/13/0f63fd2e-0d67-11eb-8074-0e943a91bf08_story.html#click=https://t.co/FO5vrnucy9
this is behind paywall.
can some anon please post this story?
ty
> according to people familiar with the matter.
>though people familiar with his findings say
>according to people familiar with the probe, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive investigation.
> the people familiar with the matter said.
>The Washington Post was unable to review the full results of what Bash found.
^^^^^^^from WAPO story…..typical …no named sources