>how'my doin so fah?
Interesting, can you point to any other time that Q responded to a cap of his own post before?
If Q hasn't than it seems like a verification, if Q has not then it seems like you just don't like the outcome.
see
>Interesting, can you point to any other time that Q responded to a cap of his own post before?
>Interesting, can you point to any other time that Q responded to a cap of his own post before?
You and your? what?
Q responded to the baker of that breads post of Bing search results, I ask again, can you show another time in 3 years Q did that?
>>11070453 ←-reply to that Q post with cap
>>11070489 ←- Q reply to cap
Q responded to the bakers posting of the bing search results after the baker asked the question. Can you show us any other time in the last 3 years that Q responded to a screencap of Q's own post? I'm trying to figure out the truth not what you want the truth to be.
why would you remove the global, they can't prove what they are saying, quite the opposite