>>11234181

Just came onto board. Reviewing LB.

Notables are shameful, not for what was included (enuf!), but for that omitted.

And was NOM'd. This is shillbakery shit!

See:

>>11233860 (LB)

Specifically called out by anon (doing Legit digging! Run the Anons card!)

NOM'd (=nominated for notable for newfags) by another anon.

IGNOREDby baker.

THIS is unacceptable!!!

BAKER notable

Any anons want tosecondthis post?

Calling out fuckery in the kitchen?

Am just an anon here.

But, any post that is put forth, nominated and seconded, SHOULD be included by Baker in notables, if they are filtering.

Anyone? Fellow Anons?

>>11234276

>if they are filtering.

If they ''aren't'' filtering. (ARE NOT Filtering).

>>11234149

Run this anons ''card'':f5c513

Single post injection?

Note pattern of following posts.

Hmmmmm.

>>11234054

Anon, good you reposted, as were ignored LB and was going to do it myself with some copypasta.

>>11234324 Baker, good you included ^^^^ Are you sincere, or just sceered of being called out with history that is SO blatant?

You crossed a red line imo Baker. Shameful.

>>11234322

>Your primary flaw is the assumption that everyone here is as stupid as you.

>>11234339

>Holy shit, are you even real?

Real anon.

Real shill ''(You)''???

>>11234343

For cogent explanations and board historical insight, see:

>>11234365

>>11234367

>>11234376

was going to grab a cap and post. but IRL calls.

Good day anons!

>>>11234376

>>>11234343

>For cogent explanations and board historical insight, see:

>>>11234365

>>>11234367

>>>11234376

>>11234431

for last post, as IRL call, will fix what never posted:

>>11234376

>>11234343

For cogent explanations and board historical insight, see:

>>11234365

>>11234367

>>11234376

>>11234416

o7 fellow anon