Anonymous ID: b7180e Oct. 25, 2020, 7:20 p.m. No.11279840   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9856 >>9896 >>0058

>>11206292 [pb]

Did Hussein contact Matt Murray in attempt to persuade not to publish?

Will Murray follow the truth or buckle to pressure?

DC civil war.

Watergate x1000.

Q

 

The takeaway from this story (which is a good read) is that WSJ declined to run on the record statements that:

1.) Confirmed the authenticity of some Biden laptop emails

2.) Showed Joe Biden had knowledge of his son’s business activities, contradicting his denials

https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1320531424726994945

 

Trump Had One Last Story to Sell. The Wall Street Journal Wouldn’t Buy It.

https://twitter.com/benyt/status/1320492533579993088

https://archive.vn/1JAKo

 

1/3

Anonymous ID: b7180e Oct. 25, 2020, 7:21 p.m. No.11279856   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9896 >>9955 >>9979 >>9988 >>0175 >>0208

>>11279840

 

Trump Had One Last Story to Sell. The Wall Street Journal Wouldn’t Buy It.

Inside the White House’s secret, last-ditch effort to change the narrative, and the election — and the return of the media gatekeepers.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/25/business/media/hunter-biden-wall-street-journal-trump.html

https://archive.is/PGCW9

 

2/3

Anonymous ID: b7180e Oct. 25, 2020, 7:23 p.m. No.11279896   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9942

>>11279840

>>11279856

>Trump Had One Last Story to Sell. The Wall Street Journal Wouldn’t Buy It.

 

Mr. Trump and his allies expected the Journal story to appear Monday, Oct. 19, according to Mr. Bannon. That would be late in the campaign, but not too late — and could shape that week’s news cycle heading into the crucial final debate last Thursday. An “important piece” in The Journal would be coming soon, Mr. Trump told aides on a conference call that day.

Editors’ Picks

 

The White Issue: Has Anna Wintour’s Diversity Push Come Too Late?

Martin Amis Offers the ‘Inside Story’ of His Relationships With Three Famous Writers

I Was Done Dating. Then I Joined a Hookup App.

 

His comment was not appreciated inside The Journal.

 

“The editors didn’t like Trump’s insinuation that we were being teed up to do this hit job,” a Journal reporter who wasn’t directly involved in the story told me. But the reporters continued to work on the draft as the Thursday debate approached, indifferent to the White House’s frantic timeline.

 

When Mr. Trump stepped on stage, the president acted as though the details of the emails and the allegations were common knowledge. “You’re the big man, I think. I don’t know, maybe you’re not,” he told Mr. Biden at some point, a reference to an ambiguous sentence from the documents.

 

As the debate ended, The Wall Street Journal published a brief item, just the stub of Mr. Areddy and Mr. Duehren’s reporting. The core of it was that Mr. Bobulinski had failed to prove the central claim. “Corporate records reviewed by The Wall Street Journal show no role for Joe Biden,” The Journal reported.

 

Asked about The Journal’s handling of the story, the editor in chief, Matt Murray, said the paper did not discuss its newsgathering. “Our rigorous and trusted journalism speaks for itself,” Mr. Murray said in an emailed statement.

 

And if you’d been watching the debate, but hadn’t been obsessively watching Fox News or reading Breitbart, you would have had no idea what Mr. Trump was talking about. The story the Trump team hoped would upend the campaign was fading fast.

 

3/3

Anonymous ID: b7180e Oct. 25, 2020, 7:33 p.m. No.11280058   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>11279840

>Did Hussein contact Matt Murray in attempt to persuade not to publish?

>Will Murray follow the truth or buckle to pressure?

>DC civil war.

>Watergate x1000.

>Q

 

I don’t know how WSJ explains this.

Bobulinski made a serious allegation that he had backed up by teams of contemporaneous evidence that journalists dream of

https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1320534744568913920