>>11279896 (pb)
That piece had a weird feel to it. Like the author wanted to justify censorship and suppression of news as some sort of protection for the public. "Gatekeepers" indeed.
The huge implications for National Security are undeniable. Americans are being fed media pablum and dissension is being censored and suppressed by "Big Tech" to further the takeover of the United States, by elite tyrants especially Chinese communists.
Good one, WSJ- What a moment to assert your journalistic "independence" or maybe it was your addiction to Chinese money.