>>12136061
>Which is of course contrary to the Word of God.
I believe we may have had this discussion before:
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/4901313.html#7814396
It is contrary to YOUR understanding of the word of God, but not contrary to the ACTUAL word of God.
Traditional Protestant eschatology is called historicism. The Jesuit futurism popularized almost everywhere today as John Darby's dispensational premillennialism, was developed as a counter-reformation deception, The Jesuits created both futurism and preterism as a counter to the traditional Protestant view - historicism.
"Historicists see in the prophecies concerning the Dragon, the Beast, the False Prophet, and the Whore of Babylon, references to the pagan Roman Empire, papal Rome (that is, Roman Europe under the rule of the popes ), the Papacy, and the Roman Catholic Church… THIS IS THE VIEW THAT UNITED ALL PROTESTANTS THROUGHOUT THE REFORMATION…"
http://historicism.com/tour/tour2.htm
Futurism was rejected by Protestants until the late 19th century. Therefore, it is YOUR view which is novel and unbiblical from a traditional Protestant perspective. The paper clip PDF download shows a listing of traditional protestants and what they believed. I'm sorry if their interpretation does not match yours.
“In all ages of the Church, from the days of Gregory the Great down to the present, men have pointed to the Papacy as the fulfillment of the prophecy.
That interpretation is set forth "in the Homilies of the Church of England and by all the Reformed Churches.
Dr. Charles H. H. Wright - “Daniel and His Prophecies,” p. 168. London: 1906.
Here is an example of well known, traditional Protestant bible commentators, interpreted the text in the way you SAY is unbiblical.
The Geneva Study Bible
Rev. 13:11
"The second part of the vision, concerning the ecclesiastical dominion, which in Rome succeeded that which was politic, and is in the power of the corporation
of false prophets and of the forgers of false doctrine. Therefore the same beast, and the body or corporation is called a false prophet by John; Re 16:13,19:20."
https://biblehub.com/commentaries/gsb/revelation/13.htm
Ellicott's Commentary
Rev. 13:11
Because of this seductiveness, and of his efforts to support his mission with higher sanctions (Revelation 13:13), he is called in later chapters (Revelation 16:13; Revelation 19:20; Revelation 20:10) the False Prophet;
https://biblehub.com/commentaries/ellicott/revelation/13.htm
Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
The Beast from the Land, Revelation 13:11 (1611 another beast)
Afterwards called the False Prophet, Revelation 16:13, Revelation 19:20, Revelation 20:10.
"How could the mutual relations of the political and ecclesiastical powers in the apostate Roman empire be better represented than by these wonderful symbols?
Here are a monarchy and a priesthood in close, nefarious association; the priesthood anoints the monarchy, serves it, uses it."
http://www.historicism.com/Guinness/Romanism/Lecture4.htm
>They (SDA'S) do, however, believe that the Antichrist and the False Prophet are one and the same person.
So? They hold some things in common with traditional Protestant eschatology but they also deviate, weaving in their own distinctives