>METEORITE STRIKES MADE LIFE ON EARTH POSSIBLE, STUDY SAYS
Sorry. But the study is likely wrong.
Life on Earth required certain conditions, which have nothing to do with meteors.
One key flaw in "science's" collective understanding is that there are far too many unproven theories that are considered to be "fact", based solely off the "experts" claiming one idea should be favored over others that are to be ignored or blacklisted.
The don't even participate in conversation. It's either believe their BS or get attacked, gaslit, and blacklisted.
I could go through each false assumption that led to such conclusions, but it would take multiple posts, and the bread will be over before I gather up sauce. Regardless, feel free to ask a few questions for yourself. I'll start ya off. How do they know what the early solar system was like, or how long it's been around? What is the evidence to support such theory? Will there ever be scientific "proof" if we have no observations of what our "early" solar system was like? Do other observations made throughout time contradict "science's" assumptions? How deep does the rabbit hole go?