Baker heads up
Repost from pb for Baker.
[Mathematically Impossible]
>>11474351 (pb)
Someone with more mathskills than anon has used Benfords law to run forensic analysis on the election results. Seems to suggests (human) fraud indeed.
Sauce:
>https://twitter.com/QuasLacrimas/status/1324159485259251714
o7
>Note that the microdots discussed LB were yellow. These are black. If this is legit then there may be two different types.
There are many types of security markers. Some are visible with the naked eye, some are not (think UV-dye for printers and embedded fibers in special papers etc.).
Fun fact, anon used to work with special security ink, that could be validated if needed. We could only ever use special ink from a certain supplier, if that was out we were not substitute to it for anything else, ever.
>Damn, so if I understand this correctly, considering how the rest of the world is still living under the msm spell (orange man bad)
Problem is that once people wake up, you cannot get them back to sleep.
Why do you think Twitter and Fakenews media are going full-retard? They know this is the last battle and they are losing ground every second.
Not sure if this was in the notables before but they also got caught siphoning votes from Jo Jorgenson (who is not Libertarian, but yeah).
I tried to find the actual twitter link to sauce to, but either J@ck is suppressing my search or this tweet is deleted/sent to the digital gulag.
(Other anons are welcome to try and find his tweet)
Checked and Kek agrees
They really overplayed their hand in trying to get this.
Like clockwork. Morning fren!
D2L o7
Second this notion, someone with means/social can get pic from >>11474771 to them?
Better one time too many than not at all.
This makes for an interesting read if anons haven't already:
The main source for the election results are provided by one company. With ties to the Gates Foundation.
If they wanted, they can decide to publish results that will then be parroted out by the Fakestream news outlets. Even if official counts would not support said results.
>Is there a way to find/duplicate the post for validation purposes? Will keep looking.
I could not find the tweet, even when I used the exact search phrase. (Seach could be suppressed Same with that Documentary Q linked, Out of Shadows)
Also tried a reverse image search, both the full pic and cropped for just the data, but only general election pictures came up for me. Used Goog, Yandex and Tineye.
Kicking myself I didn't copy the twitter adress now. have been up for something 35 hours in a row, maybe get a nap in or something
Great post, I'm going to put that on a tile on my wall. o7
To ask the question is to answer it.
Went trough my own screencaps, sadly mine just focused only on Trump and Biden, lesson learned. Closest Cap I have is 50%, but the totals I have with the leap Biden makes seems to suggest there was a significant jump, but I cannot say for sure since I don't have the other parties in my own data. Going to bed now and will look for more supporting data next shift. o7