>>11505207

Noice intro. Effective.

>Q's London pics seem to still taking up a lot of UK Anons time, It would be lovely if Q could give us a nod that we are not wasting our time and that there is still moar for us to find. We are dedicated Anons but we could do with a little help from the boss.

In my case, the digz on these pics has been almost all-consuming of my time on the boards. That is because of my reasoning on the availablel evidence. And, as that evidence has grown, my concentration has increased as has my efforts. But I do not expect other Anons to do as I have done and continue to do. Anons are as welcomed to cast skeptical eye on the London Pics digz as they are welcomed to contribute in any other way within their means. It is a special flagship dig, I believe, for the UK bread and as such can not be a waste of time. Moar eyes will see the relevance of UK in the broader scheme of things across our globe.

On the other hand, we have reached very narrowed time ranges for each and every pic, at this time. Might this or that pic be moar narrowly bookended, we will get there.

The real werk continues based on the results of the London Pics digz. W have werked on the where and the when. Also the effort is drawn to the who, what, and why - and HOW. The time ranges are the framework - the Timeframe. Not a concusion but a beginning, the foundation, of harder digz yet to be undertaken.

Many UK anons will be moar familiar with the GENERAL breads than with the UK breads. And the general pool of skillz and talents and resources is at this time much moar deep than the UK breads. All of this can change in an instance because UK anons are alert and effective wherever they apply themselves. Just think of the time range digz as prep that will stand for a very long time. Prep in setting the stage but also prep in how research is held to a high standard.

Just my two pence.

WWG1WGA

ps Vid series has been revamped for earlier release. Still looking for input on ways to archive off u-tooobles for greater durability.

>>11509758

>>11510060

XLENT. The NIOC is an institution with a missiosn to inter-connect worldwide via the hub of LONDON.

>>11516201

Perhaps the most accessible portion of the context of the LONDON PICS is SPYGATE and it origins. Thus far we understand that 2015/2016 was a critical period, however, these pics were taken 2013/2014 and so suggest that Q wants us to expand our thinking to a time before DJT was a candidate for president. In effect, it almost takes the spotlight off DJT and his campaign. And that is odd because the centre of SPYGATE, supposedly, was DJT and his campaign. Whatever these pics are about it is bigger than that that.

To expand from the immediacy of DJT's part in the SPYGATE context, one moves from the assumption that the pics were taken 2014/2016 to the confusing actuality of 2013/2014. Nailing down the time range for each pic has had its problems along the way and there are limits to just how narrowly we can make each time range fit the available evidence. But we have moved the bookends back about two years and done so with the utmost of care for adhering to direct evidence.

So on one level the pics are about testing the limits of our research and tuning our methods to a much bigger and deeper series of digz into the origins of Q's posts that feature the pictorial evidence in LONDON. I would now say that there is an effective team of forensic photo diggerz here in the UK bread who have helped form a shared set of methods to spot and verify details within the camera frame. That is transferable to other digz. We have proceeded organically, with open source vids and pics and docs. Q has prompted us with guidance and this has developed our diggers and their methods and resources.

On other levels there are the time ranges themselves - products of research. And various offshoots into topics that broaden the scope of the LONDON pics too.

Who are in these pics? What is depicted in each of these scenes? How is this meaningful and how doe sit fit into Q's overall purpose in communicating with Anons? Why has our attention been brought to attend to any of that?

A question that Q has asked in posts that seemingly are not about these LONDON pics is something that is asked silently just by Q posting these specific images. That question is, WHY ARE WE HERE? As in here, here in this pic, and as in, here, scrutinizing and studying these images?

>>11517235

Q posted a distraction?

>>11517371

>I don't think we are supposed to be analyzing bus stops and landmarks and what was in shop windows.

Not just any bus stops and landmarks and store fronts, Anon. Whether or not you think that you should analyze the evidence in the pictures is certainly up to you. But here you are telling us that we are not supposed to follow the guidance provided by Q posts.

Serious question. How does other people following Q's guidance distract you from not following Q's guidance on the pics?

>>11517371

>Q posted some pics ages ago,

'Ages ago' was as recent as the London pic posted waaaaaaay back on 3 DEC 2019. But maybe you meant the earlier posts of FEB 2018 and those during the one year interval. Toay is NOV 2020 which is less than a year since LISAMI6 was posted. Maybe you intended to say it feels like ages to you and that dictates your thinking.

>>11517633

Concur, fren. Would also recommend posting the UK map of Q posts, IF other anons think it useful as an at-fingertips resource. This was posted as a graphic last bread in about 4 parts.

>>11518016

Map of Q posts related to London pics (six parts)

https://qanon.news/Archives/x/11047711#11271113

>>11518013

Your remarks are confusing as you at first said that you do not think we should be doing this because, you said, it is a distraction. Now you say you did not tell us what you think we should be doing.

Here let me explain. Q has posted guidance to find the markers, including physical landscape, street/surroundings updates; prompted Anons to check on the provided time guide, Timeframe, determine the year, and so forth. There are two pics re bus stops - one of a double decker at a stop and another of a comms transformer or somescuh at a different stop. And there are details - such as found on a shopfront - that distinguish the time range within which the pics could have been taken.

If Q posted a pic, today, would you not be interested in where it was taken, when, and why it was posted? What if a year or so later one of those questions was still unanswered - for example, where the pic was taken, when it was taken, or why it was posted? Would you rely on assumptions, hastily drawn the day or the week the pic first appeared and the, a week or so later put it aside even if these basic questions remained? Why are we here, Anon, on the Q research boards if not to analyze the crumbs and the broader significance of the drops?

Not suggesting you should do this or that, but it is confusing that you would post remarks that would put-off others from following guidance found in the Q posts. Is it because you think moar space in the UK breads be used for other digz or other purposes? If so, then, yes, please make those contributions because that would benefit all lurkers and prolly would help with these London pics tangentially.

Cheers,

WWG1WGA