He goes on Infowars to spread Fulford-grade financial reset bullshit and claim it's used to track ballots. It's not that hard to figure out.
Detritus to deleted threads can be cleaned out.
Tampering with machine votes requires a higher level of technical sophistication. But if you can do it then there is no evidence left behind.
It's apparently not as secured as Q thought.
Nancy Pelosi's brother-in-law's wife is not named Lisa. They're probably unrelated.
>How do you know it wasn’t watched? Why stop them when you can watch them do a crime and expose it?
I suspect it was watched. However I don't think Q was expecting it to be so successful. If it comes to it, after the recounts and legal challenges fail, then our guys have plenty of shit to throw at the fan.
I should have saved this one for a few weeks form now.
>that the evidence of fraud is going to be so humiliating that more people will get pissed off at the dems then they will at Trump.
Statistical oddities wont do that. Spoopy videos of coolers and wagons being dragged in in the middle of night wont do it. Neither will arcane reports from NSA annalists about voting machine firmwares. The only thing I can imagine that would be big enough are smoking-gun intercepted phone calls. But there is a fourth amendment issue if there were no bonafide investigations at the time. It could get messy. That's the outcome I'm worried about.