>>11608944 (pb)
using a distressed child as a prop is lower than shills
if Q is doing comms to operators in the field in that drop then they would know.
no one is going to give you a straight story about it, anon, three years later.
It was clear in January of 2018 that the activity of Q often involved Q giving information to operators in the field.
and so . . . it wasn't meant for us.
like the sky king stuff, do not answer.
ie: if you don't know what this is then so what? move along.
? who says that they ahve an OS.
what platform do they run?
what flavor of operating system?
they don't have their own OS.
here's teh thing: you can not discredit someone who knows his shit, talks the talk, and finds the reasl frauld and says it clearly and concisely so that others can hear it.
He mints the finest product: knowledge of systems that he can share with a team of investigators. The subject of his 'character' (which we know to be stellar) is simply never and issue in these cases.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%9CClinux
https://sourceforge.net/projects/uclinux/files/
the uclinux site seems . . . not there.
THere is a 'way back' version of it.
but the sourceforge page is really the place if that OS is still useful . . . for new development.
no MMR?
but the answer to it not being there anymore is probably answered in the wikipedia article:
"Greg Ungerer (who originally ported μClinux to the Motorola ColdFire family of processors) continued to maintain and actively push core μClinux support into the 2.6 series Linux kernels. In this regard, μClinux is essentially no longer a separate fork of Linux. "
which is very meaningful for anyone who knows what it means (not making a joke, saying it's not information for everyone, but OS pepole will understand)
both of these ask questions knowing fully the answer to them just to be twit-witted