Let's talk about Pope Francis supposedly "liking" an image of a Brazilian Lingerie Model and not the McCarrick Report

The McCarrick Report: A Timeline

Published by the Vatican Nov. 10, the report examines the “institutional knowledge and decision-making” regarding Theodore McCarrick,

the former cardinal found guilty of sexual abuse of minors and seminarians in 2019.

Catholic News Agency Vatican

November 22, 2020

VATICAN CITY — The following is a timeline of important dates from the McCarrick Report. Published by the Vatican Nov. 10, the report examines the “institutional knowledge and decision-making” regarding Theodore McCarrick, the former cardinal found guilty of sexual abuse of minors and seminarians in 2019 and laicized after an expedited canonical investigation.

Early Life:

July 7, 1930: Theodore Edgar McCarrick was born in New York City, the only child of Theodore E. and Margaret McLaughlin McCarrick.

1949: McCarrick graduated from Fordham Preparatory School, a prominent Catholic high school in New York. After graduation, McCarrick spent a year in Switzerland, developing his knowledge of French, German and Italian languages.

1954: McCarrick graduated from Fordham University in New York with a Bachelor of Arts degree in philosophy.

1954-1958: McCarrick attended St. Joseph’s Seminary in New York, and attained a Master of Arts in theology.

Priesthood:

May 1958: New York’s Cardinal Francis Spellman ordained McCarrick to the priesthood at St. Patrick’s Cathedral. McCarrick wass incardinated into the Archdiocese of New York.

September 1958: McCarrick was assigned to doctoral studies in sociology at the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C. During this time, he also directed the Institute for Spanish Studies at the Catholic University of Puerto Rico in Ponce.

1961-1963: McCarrick served as Dean of Studies, chaplain, and graduate school teacher at CUA.

1963: McCarrick received his doctorate in sociology from CUA. He was appointed assistant to the rector at CUA and also the university’s first director of development (a fundraising position).

July 1965: McCarrick was approved for a leave of office to serve as president of the Catholic University of Puerto Rico.

Monsignor McCarrick/ “Uncle Ted”

November 1965: Pope Paul VI granted McCarrick the honorary title of Monsignor.

1969: McCarrick was appointed Associate Secretary for Education for the Archdiocese of New York. He lived and engaged in pastoral work at the Church of the Blessed Sacrament in Manhattan.

1971: McCarrick became secretary to New York’s Cardinal Terence Cooke and lived in the rectory attached to St. Patrick’s Cathedral. McCarrick traveled with Cooke on multiple overseas trips and met some of America’s most prominent political and religious figures. He was also in regular contact with wealthy donors through his fundraising work for the Archdiocese, and became renowned for his competent fundraising skills.

During this time, McCarrick took on the nickname “Uncle Ted,” as he grew close with several large Catholic families in the area. With the blessing of their parents, McCarrick spent time with their teenage children, whom he called “nieces” and “nephews”, and traveled regularly with them, including overnight trips.

September 1976: McCarrick was called away from a fishing trip in the Bahamas with some of his “nieces and nephews” and asked to return to New York for the visit of Cardinal Karol Wojtyla, who was accompanied by his secretary, Stanisław Dziwisz. Cardinal Cooke assigned McCarrick to accompany Wojtyla and Dziwisz on the trip as a translator. Wojtyla and Dziwisz were on a brief visit to the U.S. for the International Eucharistic Congress.

Bishop of Metuchen and the first anonymous reports

November 1981: Pope John Paul II appointed McCarrick as Bishop of Metuchen in New Jersey, after again receiving glowing reviews of him in the terna evaluating him for the position.

1982-1986: As Bishop, McCarrick was successful in fundraising and fostering priestly vocations. He served on committees for the U.S. bishops’ conference and traveled extensively overseas, and met with Pope John Paul II on several brief occasions. He promoted annual spiritual retreats for clergy at a beach house on the Jersey Shore, and went on trips with his “nephews” - the teenage children of Catholic families in the area with whom he had fostered close relationships. Some of these young men shared a bed with McCarrick on overnight trips.

MORE AT LINK - https://www.ncregister.com/news/the-mccarrick-report-a-timeline

>>11740856

MORE McCARRICK SCANDAL: A TIMELINE

Mid 1980s: A New York Catholic mother, identified as “Mother 1”, sent out an anonymous letter to every Cardinal in the United States, as well as the papal nuncio, detailing concerns that McCarrick was “attracted to boys.” Mother 1’s family had grown close to McCarrick during his time in New York. Mother 1 grew suspicious after she observed McCarrick rubbing her sons’ inner thighs and chests, and when she was told he bought alcohol for the young men on overnight trips. Fearing backlash for speaking against the prominent cleric, she kept her identity anonymous. No copies of Mother 1’s letter were found for the McCarrick report.

Archbishop of Newark

May 24, 1986: Pope John Paul II appointed McCarrick, nearly 56 years old, as Archbishop of Newark, after receiving more strong recommendations from bishops in the U.S. None mentioned concerns regarding inappropriate behavior.

1986-2000: As Archbishop of Newark, McCarrick continued extensive international travels, mostly for work with the U.S. bishop’s conference on international affairs. McCarrick also served in U.S. government roles in the 1980s and 1990s, including committees focused on religious freedom and international affairs. Hence, McCarrick became known to many prominent international political and religious leaders, and built up an extensive network of connections.

McCarrick also frequently visited Rome for meetings at the Vatican. He often stayed at the Pontifical North American College during these trips, where he met American priests and seminarians, and attended public and private religious events with Pope John Paul II.

In the late 1980s, Archbishop McCarrick also helped create the Papal Foundation, using his connections and fundraising skills to fund charitable endeavors of the Vatican. He also began his decades-long practice of giving gifts to Curia and nunciature officials, as well as to prelates throughout the world.

Archbishop McCarrick was considered to be a capable and hard-working leader of Newark, where he fundraised money for poor parishes, fostered vocations and built Redemptoris Mater, a new diocesan seminary.

He had frequent reunions with the families he had grown close to in New York, and celebrated some of his “nieces and nephews” marriages and baptized their children. These reunions, attended by priests, seminarians and lay secretaries of the Archdiocese, were not reported to be of an unhealthy nature.

>>11740870

Accusations from seminarians and priests

1989-1996: Three priests, identified as Priest 1, Priest 3, and Priest 4, reported to Bishop Edward Hughes (McCarrick’s successor in Metuchen) instances sexual assault they suffered by McCarrick while he was in Metuchen. The accusations, reported in separate meetings, included sharing a bed with McCarrick and sexual touching and assault that occurred during overnight stays at the beach house at the Jersey shore while two of the priests were seminarians. One of the incidents, reported by Priest 3, occurred while he was a priest. These priests later said that Hughes listened to them, but either sent them on for therapy, or urged them to forgive McCarrick. There is no evidence that Hughes told anyone else of these priests’ reports of McCarrick’s misconduct.

January 1990: Monsignor Dominic Bottino, of the Diocese of Camden, New Jersey, attended a small celebration with McCarrick. Both Bottino and his Bishop, James Thomas McHugh, noticed McCarrick groping the crotch of a young priest. McHugh dismissed Bottino’s voiced concerns, and said that McCarrick was just “different.” Bottino told his spiritual director at the time of the incident, but no one else, since his bishop dismissed the incident.

1992-1993: Six anonymous letters and one pseudonymous letter alleging sexual misconduct by McCarrick were mailed to various Catholic prelates, including nuncio Cacciavillan, Cardinal O’Connor, and leaders of the U.S. bishop’s conference. The letters accuse McCarrick of pedophilia or incest and sharing beds with young men. Some of McCarrick’s “nephews” with whom he shared beds were his distant relatives.

The accusations against McCarrick at this time are dismissed on the basis of McCarrick’s good reputation, and due to the anonymity of the letter and the lack of specific accusations.

1993-1995: Newark is evaluated as a potential site for a papal visit by Pope John Paul II.

During this evaluation, Mother Mary Quentin Sheridan, Superior General of the Religious Sisters of Mercy of Alma (Michigan), and a priest called Nuncio Cacciavillan about reports they had heard of seminarians abused by McCarrick. After consulting Cardinal James Hickey of Washington, D.C., about the allegations, Cacciavillan dismissed them as “possible slander or exaggeration.”

Cardinal Hickey told the nuncio he knew McCarrick and his associates very well and had never heard of or seen any inappropriate behavior from McCarrick.

1995: Pope John Paul II visits Newark, and the visit proceeds without any report of scandal.

1996-1997: Priest 1 had been accused of sexual assault of two minors and was on leave. In the course of an evaluation of his fitness for ministry, Priest 1 told psychiatrist Dr. Richard Fitzgibbons and priest-psychologist Msgr. James Cassidy of the sexual assault he witnessed and experienced at the hands of McCarrick. Cassidy reported the matter to Cardinal O’Connor, who told Bishop Hughes. In 2000, in an account to Nuncio Cacciavillan, Hughes stated that he was not sure whether to believe the report, as Priest 1 has a “history of blaming others for his own problems.”

March 1997: Dr. Fitzgibbons traveled to Rome to share the information he had received from Priest 1 with an official at the Congregation for Bishops. The Congregation unsuccessfully attempted to contact Priest 1. There is no evidence of further action taken.

>>11740874

Consideration for New York and Washington, D.C.

June-July 1999: Pope John Paul II tells Cardinal O’Connor that he was considering appointing McCarrick to the Archdiocese of New York.

July 1999: Cardinal O’Connor advised Nuncio Montalvo that McCarrick should not be elevated to New York due to moral issues. Montalvo asked O’Connor to put his concerns in writing.

October 27, 1999: Nuncio Montalvo sent a report to Cardinal Lucas Moreira Neves, Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops, regarding the Archbishopric of New York. Based on recommendations from U.S. bishops and cardinals, Montalvo recommended McCarrick for the position and noted he would be a “worthy member” of the College of Cardinals. He added that McCarrick has been accused of “misplaced affection” but that there was no supporting evidence.

October 28, 1999: After a delay for cancer treatment, Cardinal O’Connor wrote Montalvo with his concerns about McCarrick. O’Connor stated that it was common knowledge among clergy in the Archdiocese of Newark that McCarrick frequently shared beds with male guests, including priests and seminarians. He also noted that there had been a priest very close to McCarrick who accompanied him on at least one international trip who had since left the priesthood. Furthermore, he recalled that a psychologist and psychiatrist had confirmed the veracity of the claims of at least one priest who said he was victimized by McCarrick.

Cardinal O’Connor also stated that McCarrick had written a letter of defense of a young man convicted of murdering a young woman. He also noted that the general attitude among clergy in Newark and Metuchen was that their concerns about McCarrick had been ignored.

Montalvo forwarded the letter to the Congregation for Bishops and to the Secretariat of State. Archbishop Re, then Substitute of the Secretariat of State, informed Pope John Paul II of the letter. At the request of the Pope, Re consulted Cacciavillan, who had been nuncio in the U.S. when most of the allegations against McCarrick had occurred.

Cardinal Cacciavillan cast serious doubt on all six of Cardinal O’Connor's concerns, saying the incidents were just a few rumors. He added that McCarrick had not been given a chance to defend himself. Still, he recommended that McCarrick go to Washington D.C. instead of New York, because Cardinal O’Connor had not recommended McCarrick as his successor.

November 22, 1999: Archbishop Re, per the request of the Pope, wrote to Montalvo, asking him to look into the claims against McCarrick at his convenience “for the sake of the truth.”

February 8, 2000: Cardinal Neve of the Congregation of Bishops told Montalvo that, based on the accusations against McCarrick, as well as his age (almost 70), he should not be transferred to a different diocese.

May-June 2000: Following the death of O’Connor, Montalvo investigated the claims against McCarrick. He asked Bishop James T. McHugh (Diocese of Rockville Centre, 1998-2000); Bishop Vincent D. Breen (Diocese of Metuchen, 1997-2000); Bishop Edward T. Hughes (Diocese of Metuchen, 1987-1997); and Bishop John M. Smith (Diocese of Trenton, 1997-2010), to send him any factual information or other observations about any moral weaknesses in McCarrick.

May 12, 2000: Bishop McHugh responds to Montalvo. He confirms knowledge of McCarrick sharing beds with seminarians, priests and other men, though he said he had not witnessed “improper behavior” but rather a “familiarity (that) was imprudent.” He confirmed McCarrick’s defense of the young man convicted of murder, and offered to be of further assitance.

May 16, 2000: Bishop Breen responds to Montalvo, saying he head rumors of “illicit activities with young men” but that he had no way to prove them. He recommends contacting Bishop Hughes for more information.

>>11740880

May 18, 2000: Bishop Smith responds to Montalvo. He said while he lived with McCarrick, he would be visited by his “nephews” from New York on occasion, and that they would sometimes spend the night, but never indicated the next morning that they were upset or that anything improper had happened. He said he would be “completely shocked” if an individual were to accuse McCarrick of serious wrongdoing or moral failure.

May 22, 2000: Bishop Hughes responds to Montalvo. He said he does not have factual information regarding McCarrick’s moral weaknesses. He noted that two priests who came forward with accusations, Priest 6 and Priest 1, did so in the course of admitting their own moral failures and may have been attempting to justify their actions. He recommends against McCarrick’s promotion, but also against disciplinary actions.

June 21, 2000: Montalvo sent his findings to Archbishop Re, informing him that his investigation found that accusations against McCarrick “are neither definitively proven nor completely groundless.” Based on this, he said, it would be “imprudent” to consider McCarrick for any kind of promotions.

May-July 2000: Montalvo received more endorsements for McCarrick’s appointment for Washington.

July 2000: Archbishop Re and Pope John Paul II concluded that it would be unwise to promote McCarrick to Washington, D.C.

August 6, 2000: McCarrick wrote to Bishop Stanisław Dziwisz, Pope John Paul II’s secretary, refuting the accusations against him. He said he was “tipped off” by a Curia friend about O’Connor’s letter which had “deeply attacked” him and left him “bewildered.”

“Your Excellency, sure I have made mistakes and may have sometimes lacked in prudence, but in the seventy years of my life, I have never had sexual relations with any person, male or female, young or old, cleric or lay, nor have I ever abused another person or treated them with disrespect,” McCarrick wrote. “…if I understand the accusations that Cardinal O’Connor may have made, they are not true.”

McCarrick added that he would accept whatever decision the Holy Father made.

August 2000: Bishop Dziwisz delivered McCarrick’s letter to the Pope, who gave the letter to Archbishop Re. Re later said John Paul II had become convinced of McCarrick’s innocence after that letter.

Sept. 16, 2000: Pope John Paul II appointed Archbishop Re Prefect of the Congregation for Bishops.

Sept. 20, 2000: The secretary for the Congregation of Bishops wrote to Archbishop Cacciavillan and asked that McCarrick be reconsidered for the Washington Archbishopric based on his letter to Dziwisz pleading innocence.

September 25, 2000: In a written memorandum, Archbishop Cacciavillan recommended McCarrick to the Congregation for Bishops for the Washington position. He said McCarrick could defend himself against any accusations that may come to light with the appointment, since they were false.

October 2000: McCarrick traveled to Rome for a private audience with Dziwisz and Pope John Paul II. There is no record of what occurred in the meeting.

October 11, 2000: Re recommended McCarrick as one of two candidates for the Washington position to Pope John Paul II.

>>11740884

Cardinal McCarrick in Washington, D.C.

November 2000: Pope John Paul II appointed McCarrick as the Archbishop of Washington, D.C.

November 24, 2000: Dominican priest Boniface Ramsey, who taught at the seminary at Seton Hall University from the late 1980s-1996, knew of prevalent rumors of McCarrick sharing beds with seminarians. Alarmed at the news of McCarrick’s promotion, he wrote to Nuncio Montalvo, stating that he had heard from multiple seminarians about sharing McCarrick’s bed at the Jersey beach house. He added that while he did not know of any certain sexual relations that had occurred, “at the least the archbishop was seen to be acting with extreme impropriety and to be playing with fire.”

Father Ramsey declined to name specific seminarians, and suggested the nuncio speak with other rectors at the seminary to confirm the rumors. Father Ramsey told a friend and Montalvo that he strongly feared backlash for expressing his concerns. He did not recall receiving any response.

Early 2001: Montalvo received an anonymous note warning of serious scandal if McCarrick is made a Cardinal.

January 2001: Montalvo forwarded the anonymous note and Ramsey’s letter to Secretary of State Cardinal Sodano, who forwarded the letters to Pope John Paul II. The Pope gave them back to Sodano, who made a note: Nihil dicens, or “nothing is produced.”

January 3, 2001: Archbishop McCarrick is installed as Archbishop of Washington.

February 21, 2001: McCarrick is elevated to a Cardinal by Pope John Paul II.

>>11740890

Cardinal McCarrick

Early 2000s: McCarrick continued extensive work on numerous national and international committees of the U.S. bishop’s conference, including a prominent role in constructing new policies for addressing child sexual abuse within the Church. He is also appointed to numerous Vatican council positions.

His position in Washington meant he regularly met with federal government officials, including President George W. Bush. Following Sept. 11, 2001, McCarrick played a prominent role in addressing the crisis with national figures.

McCarrick, despite refusing a salary as an Archbishop, continued large donations and financial gifts to the Holy Father, other prelates, religious orders, and disaster relief funds. His extensive international travels continued. He was also tasked by the U.S. government in 2001 with developing diplomatic relations between China and the Vatican, a project he enthusiastically undertook and which was supported by the nuncio.

November 15, 2001: Cardinal Hickey, then Archbishop Emeritus of Washington, received a letter from a Catholic layman and former student about “wrongdoing” by a bishop, but he did not mention McCarrick specifically. The man requested a meeting to discuss the matter more. Montalvo assigned Bishop William Lori to meet with the man. In a written report, Lori said that the man could not recall any specific details of wrongdoing by McCarrick, and ultimately dismissed the allegation as “hearsay.”

January 2002: The Boston Globe published a series of stories about child sexual abuse by U.S. priests, and a major scandal erupted in the Church in the U.S.

March 2002: Montalvo received another letter from a layman, who had spiritually directed a transitional deacon at Seton Hall, who claimed that McCarrick had been “sexually inappropriate” with him at the Jersey beach house. Montalvo contacted Newark Archbishop John Myers, who later responded that he did not recognize the deacon’s name. He added that he had received other anonymous accusations against McCarrick but that they were untraceable rumors and not concrete incidents. No further action or investigation is undertaken.

April 2002: McCarrick admitted to Susan Gibbs, communications director for the Archdiocese of Washington, that he had shared beds with seminarians as she questioned him about rumors. He told Gibbs that he only ever traveled with groups of seminarians and not alone, and that they were always clothed when they shared a bed. He said he shared beds with them because he thought it was inappropriate to ask seminarians to share beds with each other.

Gibbs questioned McCarrick multiple times about the rumors, and contacted former diocesan personnel of his, but none of them reported any specific instances of improper behavior. She also talked to reporters from the Washington Post and the New York Times, who also could not get anyone to go on the record or on background with any specific allegations.

McCarrick was questioned for two separate media interviews about the sex abuse crisis, including the allegations against him. He told reporters that the accusation was anonymous, that he had brought it forward, and that he had never had sexual relations with anyone in his life.

November 15, 2004: Bishop Donald Wuerl of the Diocese of Pittsburgh sent Montalvo a signed statement from Priest 2, the former seminarian and priest of the Diocese of Metuchen. In it, the priest recalled “problematic” and “extremely inappropriate” behavior including backrubs and bed sharing with McCarrick. He did not overtly accuse him of sexual abuse in the statement. There is no record that Montalvo forwarded the letter to the Vatican.

February 24, 2005: Archbishop Myers of Newark wrote to Nuncio Montalvo warning him that McCarrick’s behavior, according to Priest 2’s lawyer, may constitute abuse. There is no record that Montalvo contacted the Vatican about this.

April 2005: McCarrick traveled to Rome after the death of Pope John Paul II and participated in the conclave that elected Pope Benedict XVI.

June 2005: A settlement was reached with Priest 2 and the Diocese of Metuchen for $80,000. No lawsuit was filed, and McCarrick was not named specifically in the settlement, which also covered accusations of abuse from a high school teacher in the diocese. McCarrick sent $10,000 to the diocese around this time, apparently as part of the settlement. There is no indication that the nuncio or the Vatican knew of this settlement.

>>11740895

Late June 2005: In a dispute about Priest 1’s fitness for ministry, summaries of the instances of abuse from McCarrick suffered by Priest 1 are sent to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

June 22, 2005: The night before his 75th birthday, McCarrick submitted his resignation as Archbishop of Washington to Pope Benedict XVI, as is customary per canon law.

Summer 2005: Cardinal Re, after consulting Pope Benedict XVI, extended McCarrick’s position in Washington two more years.

September 2005: A canonist working with the CDF wrote in an internal memorandum that Priest 1 had indicated that he did not want to cause public scandal in the Church with his allegations against McCarrick. Priest 1’s petition to return to active ministry was denied and the case considered closed by the Vatican.

November 5, 2005: Pope Benedict XVI reversed the decision to extend McCarrick’s term in Washington, based on credible accusations against him, likely obtained by Archbishop Levada, the new prefect for the Congregation of Bishops. Re informed the Congregation of Bishops of the request.

November 7, 2005: Re sent Nuncio Montalvo a copy of McCarrick’s August 6, 2000 letter pleading innocence to Bishop Dziwisz. Re added a note stating that new information had surfaced, making the accusations seem credible, and that he was going to ask McCarrick to withdraw from Washington. Cardinal Re also wrote to McCarrick asking him to come to Rome before the end of the month to discuss the decision.

December 5, 2005: Re met with McCarrick in Rome. McCarrick admitted to sharing beds with seminarians but said that nothing sexual ever happened, including no “incomplete” acts. He accepted moving his resignation up to Easter 2006 but asked that it be done in a way that would not be seen as a “punishment.”

Shortly thereafter, Bishop Bootkoski of the Diocese of Metuchen forwarded to Nuncio Montalvo specific allegations previously made by Priest 1 and Priest 2. Priest 2 recalled specific instances of sharing a small bed with McCarrick during which there was “inappropriate…although not clearly sexual” physical contact.

Priest 1 said he had witnessed “sexual touching” of McCarrick with his sleeping partner on one trip, and that he was told he “would be next.” On a subsequent trip, McCarrick shared a bed with Priest 1 and touched him in a sexual way. The reports were forwarded to Cardinal Re.

VATICAN 449 PAGE McCarrick Report proves Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, Taylor Marshall and Archbishop Timothy Dolan, all of whom tried to blame the

'''McCarrick scandal solely on Pope Francis, are deep state liars. The majority of the responsibility is with Saint John Paul II and Pope Benedict.==

>>11740856

>>11740870

>>11740874

>>11740880

>>11740884

>>11740890

>>11740895

>>11740928

Hey Q, Forces here tried to block the SECRET VATICAN CHINA TWO YEAR DEAL designed by Pope Benedict until you Q'ed the Pompeo Article in Drop #4799 ThanQ!

Can we out Vigano, Taylor Marshall and Dolan now pretty please?

Few will listen to me without your support as most are brainwashed and in complete denial.

All they seem to care about is the image of the church and not it's many 1000's of American Victims.

Most do not wonder why McCarrick has not been charged by Federal Authorities.

Most do not seem to care about Papal diplomatic immunity and that every Catholic Priest in this great land is an agent of a corrupt foreign government.

All they care about is the image of the church and their religion.

Faketriots everywhere

Traitors everywhere

Surrounded by evil

>>11741030

here ya go, fren

>>11741131

I am not Jewish.

My foreskin weights 5 pounds all by itself!

but nice try MUH JOO SHILL

>>11740994

>>11741021

>>11741078

>>11741107

>>11741131

Amazing contributions you bring here and nice memes! kek

You ain't really from around these parts are ya, boy?

>>11741189

>>11741194

>>11741253

Your Wish is my Command, Monsignor.

LIST OFMCCARRICK ABUSE SCANDALNEWS ARTICLES

The following breaking news proves that Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano is a liar who, with the help of Dr. Taylor Marshall and Archbishop Timothy Dolan, attempted to deceive POTUS and the World.

For years, Vigano has argued that the McCarrick scandal was the fault of Pope Francis yet the reality is that responsibility falls squarely on the newly Sainted Pope John Paul II as well as Pope Benedict.

Pope Francis and the Vatican are not innocent, knew all about McCarrick and continued to "use" him in it's affairs yet Vigano and the rest were deceiving as well.

Vigano and Marshall have went on to attempt to blame the last 200 years of Vatican criminality upon the Masons/Carbonari and men such as General Lafayette, a dear friend of George Washington.

Vigano and Marshall indirectly attack the Founding Fathers of America, many of which were Masons, if not Master Masons such as Paul Revere and George Washington.

Vigano, Taylor Marshall, Sainted Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict XVI as well as New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan all knew the Truth yet pressed the Lie for their own benefit.

Alleging sex abuse, 4 sue Vatican over handling of McCarrick - David Porter Nov 20, 2020

https://cruxnow.com/church-in-the-usa/2020/11/alleging-sex-abuse-4-sue-vatican-over-handling-of-mccarrick/

Decades before the Vatican’s McCarrick report, there was a mother on a secret mission - By Michelle Boorstein November 20, 2020 at 9:12 a.m. EST

https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/2020/11/20/vatican-mccarrick-report-sex-abuse-mother/

Churches and schools not expected to quickly change John Paul II name - Nov 20, 2020 by Lucy Grindon

https://www.ncronline.org/news/accountability/churches-and-schools-not-expected-quickly-change-john-paul-ii-name

McCarrick report is one small step to dismantling clerical culture - Nov 20, 2020 by Tom Roberts

https://www.ncronline.org/news/accountability/mccarrick-report-one-small-step-dismantling-clerical-culture

Priest Among McCarrick Accusers in Lawsuit Filed Against Vatican - By Jodie Fleischer • Published November 19, 2020

https://www.nbcwashington.com/investigations/priest-among-mccarrick-accusers-in-lawsuit-filed-against-vatican/2481863/

Gregory: Report is ‘tragic chronicle’ of ‘devious’ churchman, church failures - Mark Zimmermann, CNS Nov 19, 2020 CATHOLIC NEWS SERVICE

https://cruxnow.com/church-in-the-usa/2020/11/gregory-report-is-tragic-chronicle-of-devious-churchman-church-failures/

AP Analysis: ‘Who am I to judge?’ might explain Pope Francis’ view toward McCarrick - By Nicole Winfield | The Associated Press Published: Nov 19 2020

https://www.sltrib.com/religion/2020/11/18/ap-analysis-who-am-i/

McCarrick scandal shows why popes, like John Paul, should not be canonized - Nov 17, 2020 by Thomas Reese, Religion News Service

https://www.ncronline.org/news/accountability/signs-times/mccarrick-scandal-shows-why-popes-john-paul-should-not-be-canonized

Takeaways from the Vatican’s Theodore McCarrick report as U.S. bishops meet - By The Associated Press Published: Nov 17 2020

https://www.sltrib.com/religion/2020/11/17/takeaways-vaticans/

BISHOPS CALL FOR PRAYER, FASTING AND REFORM AS USCCB DISCUSSES MCCARRICK REPORT - Catholic News Agency / November 17, 2020

https://www.thecatholictelegraph.com/mccarrick-report-bishops-call-for-prayer-fasting/70692

>>11741253

>>11741322

VATICAN RCC RESEARCH FILE 2.0

More truth than most can handle.

99% IN THE HOSPITAL

PART I

>>11663635 Q DROP#154Our Father "Who Financed 9-11?" ClownsInAmerica

>>11306328 Q DROP#189'''The Cult Runs the World GODFATHER III > PAPAL ORDERS OF KNIGHTHOOD > VATICAN'''

>>11726307 Q DROP#306 "Why was the Lord's prayer posted? Which version? Why is this relevant?" SEE DROP #154 ABOVE

>>11306340 Q DROP#714'''Q Threat to Clowns CIA > Vatican> Catholics In Action, Catholics In America, Clowns In America'''

>>11306348 Q DROP#851CIA & Vatican Helped Nazi Officers Escape

>>11306360 Q DROP#936'''The Nazi Order Vatican > Jesuits'''

>>11306372 Q DROP#997Pope will have a Terrible May - "Those who backed him pushed into the LIGHT"

>>11306379 Q DROP#1002'''The BITE that has no CURE Vatican Viper Symbolism "Symbolism will be their downfall" '''

>>11306412 Q DROP#1021Did US taxpayers pay $3.5 Billion for the Predatory Sexual Abuse Perpetrated upon Americans by the Roman Catholic Church?

>>11306430 Q DROP#1413'''Guardian of the Pope Owl Photo Q named the owl photo "Guardian_P" '''

>>11306440 Q DROP#1763'''Sex Abuse in the Church "Those you are taught to TRUST the most….. Dark to LIGHT." '''

>>11306453 Q DROP#1831'''POTUS Roasts Corrupt & Evil Hillary Clinton at Catholic Charity Event "Surrounded by EVIL." '''

>>11306467 Q DROP#1879100s of Priests in PA Molested 1000s of Children "House of GOD?"

>>11306475 Q DROP#1916'''Priest Hits Crying Baby at Baptism "Man of God?" '''

>>11306478 Q DROP#1950Holy See Corrupt Universal Government of the Catholic Church

>>11306489 Q DROP#2152Pope Francis Compares Vatican Whistleblower to Satan

>>11306494 Q DROP#2590'''Australian Cardinal George Pell Found Guilty of Sexual Abuse "[CARDINAL PELL] Dark to LIGHT." '''

>>11306507 Q DROP#2594Cardinal George Pell 3rd in Command at Vatican "Define "pecking" [Animals].

>>11306522 Q DROP#2894Vatican Treasurer Cardinal George Pell Found Guilty of Child Sex Charges "Many more to come? Dark to LIGHT."

>>11306537 Q DROP#2918'''Trump's Roast of Hillary Back in 2016 Reveals Her Dark Secrets "Symbolism will be their downfall" '''

>>11306550 Q DROP#3565'''Q Links to Pope's Tweet on Human Trafficking "GODFATHER III. It's going to be BIBLICAL" '''

>>11306563 Q DROP#3709'''Vatican Ambassador to France Resigns after Molestation Allegations "Those you are taught to trust the most…." '''

>>11306591 Q DROP#3957"Sleepers [Pro] will shift position [Nay]. [Paul Ryan_Fox]" Rupert Murdoch Papal Knight Fox news dominated by Catholics.

>>11306685 Q DROP#4303CIA's Use of Journalists and Clergy in Intelligence Operations "CIA coming back into the news [soon]?" Who really controls the Media?

>>11306697 Q DROP#4408We Are in the Middle of Another Enlightenment Approaching the Precipice. Against (the monarchy, the privileges of the

nobility, the political power of the Catholic Church)

>>11306720 Q DROP#4429'''Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò Letter to POTUS-Biblical Battle Light vs Dark"Armor of God" Vigano is not our friend.'''

>>11306736 Q DROP#4799Rebuffed by Vatican, Pompeo Assails China and Aligns With Pope’s Critics

When does a Church become a playground?

When does a Church become a business?

When does a Church become political?

When does a Church become corrupt?

When does a Church become willfully blind?

When does a Church become controlled?

>>11741253

ENJOY

VATICAN RCC RESEARCH FILE 2.0

More truth than most can handle.

99% IN THE HOSPITAL

PART II

>>11307180 '''MEET GEORGE SOROS A "Jew" or a Catholic Court Jew?'''

>>11307149 WHAT IS A COURT JEW?

>>11306887 ROBERT F. KENNEDY Jr. "The CIA killed my Father RFK and Uncle JFK" + Vaccines>COVID on Ron Paul's Show.

>>11309278 MEET ANTHONY FAUCI - A ROMAN CATHOLIC JESUIT WITH MANY CONNECTIONS TO THE DEEP STATE.

>>11307590 WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND THE VATICAN CONNECTION

'''24 year assistant Director of the Who, Milton Siegel explains exactly how the Vatican controls the W.H.O. consider the implications now with covid.'''

Is the story about China controlling the W.H.O a cover story? Does the Vatican secretly control China? The CIA?

>>11306927 Revealing look at the Director of the CIA when J.F.K. was assassinated, John A McCone. Part I

>>11306949 Revealing look at the Director of the CIA when J.F.K. was assassinated, John A McCone. Part II

>>11307201 MEET BERNHARD STEMPFLE Catholic Jesuit Priest who wrote and edited parts of Mein Kampf

>>11307730 Adolf Hitler And The Jesuit Order - Part I

>>11307750 Adolf Hitler And The Jesuit Order - Part II Von Papen, Mussolini, Fascism, Pious XII

>>11307784 Adolf Hitler And The Jesuit Order - Part III Jesuits and the CIA

>>11307499 Cuban Immigrant warns of evils of Socialism - at TRUMP round table event - Castro was trained by Catholic Jesuits

>>11307274 MEET ALPHONSE LOUIS CONSTANT AKA Éliphas Lévi Zahed Failed Catholic Priest responsible for adding "SOLVE ET COAGULA" to Baphomet image

>>11307925 MEET ARCHBISHOP CARLO MARIA VIGANO - Deep State, Deep Church, Invisible Enemy

>>11716167 List of recent news Articles proving that Vigano, Taylor Marshall and Timothy Dolan lied about the McCarrick Sexual Abuse Scandal.

>>11307021 MEET TIMOTHY DOLAN Archbishop of New York - Deep State/Church

>>11307305 MEET ADAM WEISHAUPT - FOUNDER OF THE ILLUMINATI - STRONG JESUIT CONNECTION

>>11306800 Q said "Soros takes order from P." Q DROP#416

>>11306807 Q asks "Who controls the [D] party" and "Who really controls the [D] party?" [GS] George Soros? Q DROP#3749

>>11306822 Q said "Guardian of the Pope" and titled the accompanying image of an owl "GUARDIAN_P" Q DROP#1413

>>11306775 Drops#3749, 416and1413basic decode>P = Pope/Papal Royal Families (Black nobility) Papal Orders of Knighthood (Malta)

Orders such as the Jesuits.

>>11306837 Drops#3749, 416and1413basic decode>P = ? Part II

>>11307120 '''Link between SAUL ALINSKY and the Roman Catholic Jesuits Alinsky and the Jesuits also link to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton'''

>>11307397 SONS OF LIGHT VERSUS THE SONS OF DARKNESS - THE WAR SCROLL - PART I VIGANO MUST ENJOY THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS

>>11307428 SONS OF LIGHT VERSUS THE SONS OF DARKNESS - THE WAR SCROLL - PART II VIGANO USED THIS THEME

>>11306863 CHINA VATICAN SECRET TWO YEAR DEAL IS NOT A SECRET ANYMORE.

>>11741336

>>11741389

I would not leave OSS alone for being a MUH JOO SHILL whilst baking.

OSS begged his Comms frens for help yet none of them would come to his aid so he got all butthurt and started outing them one by one.

Comms fired back and in the end they all outed one another as the biased piece of shit gate keepers that they all truly are.

I pretended to be frens with both sides so they would get even moar uppity.

I will be your motherfucking huckleberry.

Proud of that shit.

Wanna play some mind games?

>>11741476

Of course they did.

An enemy of your enemy is not necc. your fren…

>>11741478

cry more muh joo shill! kek

>>11741544

Homophobia is not my problem yet Homo sure would have saved me a lot of money! kek

>>11741586

Was it not glorious?

I have known since 2018…

You gotta dig on certain things in order to find out what they are trying desperately to avoid ie: gate keep.

Hell, even someone high up is overplaying their hand.

>>11741625

me too, have fun kids!