Tl;dr, 1) keep working to convince people of election fraud with the evidence you've got, not with the evidence you're anticipating, 2) I've scraped more than 500 MB of archived NY Times election night/week data, worth checking out if you're a data type, 3) cross correlating vote counting irregularities in the NYT data with archived MSM election night broadcasts turns up great material for convincing normies of electronic voting fraud. (Could I get graphixanons to make this memeable/shareable for the masses?)
1) I've been lurking since back when Q first started posting on halfchan, but haven't posted till now. I prefer optimism have we counted how many times Q says "nothing can stop what is coming" but not at the expense of pragmatism. Evidence of voter fraud (all kinds) keeps growing like a tsunami, but sometimes tsunamis hit unpopulated areas and no one sees them. I like to believe that part of "The Plan" Q always tells us to trust includes exposing the tsunami of election fraud evidence/proof to the masses, but the only way I see that happening at the moment is through us anons and our information warfare. Trust me, I want as badly as the next fellow to wake up tomorrow and see the MSM gushing about Trump's incredible election fraud sting op and how he saved our nation. Whether or not you believe this will actually happen is irrelevant though… It hasn't happened yet and until/if it does we need to keep working to convince people that the election was stolen, using whatever facts/evidence they will take seriously.
2) I have some experience working with data (making probabilistic models for my PhD research) and I'm trying to get into data science for a career, so when I found out that the NY Times exposes their election results data, I thought it would be a good project to pull as much data as possible. Others have beat me to it with some of the data (e.g., all 50 states timeseries, or precinct timeseries for Philly), but I think I have compiled a lot of data that hasn't been passed around yet (i.e., precinct level timeseries for GA, FL, MI, NC, and PA, county level timeseries for the whole country, congressional, senatorial, and presidential timeseries for all 50 states). Since the NYT terms of service prohibit scraping their website, and I'm not a legalanon, I thought it would be wiser (albeit slower) to grab everything from the Internet Archive instead (actually, some data I couldn't have found without using the Archive, so that worked out better anyway). Anyway, web scraping is new to me, so the effort took longer than I would have wanted, but I guess better late than never, right? If you're interested, I've put everything on GitHub at https://github.com/d0ntw84f8/election2020-timeseries-data, which includes the data, some explanation of dataset fields, scripts used to extract the data, and a few simple analysis examples (in Python) to get you started.
3) In the process of looking through the states timeseries data (this particular data has been around for a while now), I discovered several instances where Biden and/or Trump's vote counts dip down instead of up on some of the state totals. Others have looked at this in more depth, including the anon who estimated the number of votes stolen from Trump (perhaps someone can reply with a link…I can't remember where I saw that interesting analysis). This is really crazy to me as a numbers person, but your average normie needs something a bit more tangible. For most, it's all just too "wacky" and completely out of touch with their experience. How do we convince people our numbers-based conclusions are real or make sense? One answer: show them something familiar, video/still captures of glitches in the MSM election night broadcasts!
1/3 continued…