>>11883494

This what I think the answer to, "But the hand count matched the machine tally", argument.

Pre-election plan was two phased. Plan the amount of fake ballots needed ahead of time while adjusting the voting machines in individual states to massage the results to reflect the fake ballots you need to use.

IN GA, Trump got more votes than the plan had predicted.

Biden campaign director goes on media and says, "We have a number of different pathways to 270." A lot of comment election night on this abour why a campaign head would admit defeat in GA, so an anomalous statement, IMO.

It was the dogwhistle.. After that states had to lockdown to give them time to print more ballots. Those late arrival batches were the ballots from new printings.

WRT, Wood, Powell. Accurate talley, which should be in data sent electronically out of machines before they were massaged, show collins beat either Perdue of Loeffler, and/or, neither dem tallied enough for a run off.

That actual unadjusted machine tally has to find a way into court. Having a runoff with the same policy in place as the original just validates the scam and must be resisted.

Perdue and Loeffler have to come down hard on Kemp. They won't because one of them lost. POTUS has to have the threat of revelation on the table to get those two fuckers to come down on Kemp at the rally. Only way he has leverage. Trump = Good cop. Wood / Powell = bad cop.

Bottom line. What good is a slim fucking senate majority with Romney, Collins and Murkowski? 53- 47 at least so Pence is the tie-breaker.

Thinking pubs won GA outright and Senate goes 54 - 46. Why Romney is cry-babying. Only way that fucker gets air time to boost his pres credentials is holding a vote hostage.

>>11883710

Good cop / Bad cop.

Collins beat either Perdue or Loeffler and/or no dem made the runoff.

Machine operators caused ballots to go to the, "to be adjudicated", batch that all went to Biden Need to have those ballots in hand to tally them the old fashioned "hanging chad" way, not recounting the items in a folder on Dominon's server.

Perdue/Loeffler have to be arm-twisted to tell Kemp to sack up. Only way is to have Wood/Powell on their ass. Would you want Wood/Powell on your ass?

The way the girls are screeching on MSM and twitter about, "muh senate majority", tells you Wood/Powell got someone's attention.

POTUS works with leverage. He's already on record telling Kemp to man the fuck up. Do think that by asking Perdue and Loeffler nicely they would show up to hang Kemp out to dry? Fear of fucking God method at work on Loeefler and Perdue as we speak.

>>11883818

Who knows, but, why do you rush Kelly into the senate after former mil white hats claimed they watched data going offshore in real time during one of your own state's senate committee meetings.

MI AG (or SOS) is so far outside of any unbiased territory the whole election should be thrown out if they had any influence at all in it's implementation.

I think the good guys have the goods.

Bottom line, IMO, you can't have a GA runoff that will just lend authenticity to the original election. Have to be major fucking changes to voting procedure before that vote occurs, or the original has to be thrown out and re-done the right way.

If you're a lawyer, and take a client who wants to contest an election, what chance does he have to say the original election was flawed if millions of voters vote in a runoff with the exact same procedure as the original. "The will of the voters", "Can't disenfranchise millions of voters", etc., etc,. out the ass from corrupt judges once the runoff takes place. It's just fuckery to get the original election validated for legal purposes.

>>11883558

Machine rejected ballots go into a special folder. They should be looked at manually to determine the vote. They're not.

They use these ballots to run the algorithms on, then file them aware somewhere. The recount didn't look at these ballots, just the tallies on the servers.

When things got out they disabled the ballot readers (white out strips, for example) to make more for the special folder, or they printed or shipped in more mail-ins that the machines also couldn't read.

My guess.

We need to see and visually determine ballots that the machines rejected.