The 'SRIKE' will be FAST!
KEK! Well that is literally 'just a coincidence' since I wasn't even trying for that timestamp.
WWG1WGA!
Not sure about him, but in my experience there is such a thing as "finding the right woman" and it 's a VERY GOOD THING…. except for the part where she THINKS YOU ARE FUCKING CRAZY (but won't come out and say it).
DOITQ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
God wins.
meh
I have never understood how the Frankfurt School appeals to anyone but losers.
I can get how Marx, in certain respects, can be interesting, and how somehow like Lenin can get an ass-kicking interpretation from it. The WORSHIP of "capital" actually IS bad. Even if "communism" is worse.
I can get how somehow can mangle Nietzcsche and interpret him as a dumbass "racist". At least having pride for spurious reasons seems better than being one of the "last men".
I can get how an intellectual sort can embrace what is ultimately the nihilism of logical positivism - at least it opens an apparent arena for intellectual debate and trying to "sort things out".
But I have never at all seen the appeal of "the Frankfurt School"… except perhaps as an avenue for someone who is already "committed" to an "institutional life". But why? Because that is what losers chose?
> the half that stood by and watched others live their lives
Perhaps part of the problem is that these are people who buy into the idea that the only thing that matters is intellectual dominance, and yet they don't cut it intellectually, and sort of know it. The deeper error is thinking that any sort of intellectual eminence can be a way of evading striving for one's own human excellence. My take at least. Many smart people do this, but it may not come back to bite them until the end. But "Critical Theory" is what you get when dumb people do this.
That's a good question.
No doubt there are various ordinances that are treated as de facto "laws" by virtue of being enacted by organs of the bureaucracy.
But for something to actually be a law, must it not be enacted by a properly constituted legislature following its overt rules (which are public)?
Insofar as there seem to be "secret" laws, it seems an outgrowth of treating non-legislative organs of government as lawmaking entities at all. (Which seems to be a major problem…)
If you CAN'T know a law (since it is secret) then you CAN'T be held responsible for violating the law… unless we live under despotism as opposed to government sanctioned by the people.
followup…
this doesn't mean that there can't be secret government operations when needed (military or otherwise…)
But they will be (and MUST be it seems…) particular and not general. But laws must be general rules that all are obligated to obey.