Anonymous ID: f10a85 Dec. 15, 2020, 5:47 a.m. No.12036639   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6693 >>6762 >>6838 >>6945

are we currently witnessing the plan or the mirror of the plan?

Check out this shit written by a Clinton Gore hack in 2016

keeping in mind they always project

His novel was written 18 months prior so around the time of the escalator ride?

Then he describes Killary actions after the 2016 election

which mirrors what's happening now

wtf

 

>https://archive.vn/x4mu3

 

The scandal that will take down the Electoral College

Roy Neel· Friday, December 16, 2016

 

The year is 2020. An incumbent Republican president is struggling, with little interest in the job or his reelection campaign. Trailing in the polls, he gets an unexpected boost from a terrorist incident. As the country reels from the catastrophe, the election tightens, ending in a near draw. Determined to reverse the voting results, the President’s hardened advisors concoct an elaborate conspiracy to steal the election by manipulating the Electoral College.

This story, which became my novel, The Electors, was written 18 months before Donald Trump shocked the word on Nov. 8. At the time it seemed little more than a far-fetched political thriller that might delight followers of House of Cards or Homeland, or the recent network hit, Designated Survivor.

 

Yet truth has become stranger than fiction. The long-ignored Electoral College has become the final dramatic act in our complex system of electing someone to fill the world’s most powerful job. As Trump prepares to take office in six weeks, new revelations about

Vladimir Putin’s alleged cyber-hacking attempts to influence the outcome of the presidential election have caused some electors to question their commitment to Trump when they meet to vote next Monday.

In my novel, the president’s Chief of Staff masterminds a secret program to persuade a few electors to switch their votes to throw the election into the House of Representatives, which would decide the outcome=. In my novel (and in reality) each state would receive one vote. California, with 38 million citizens: one vote. Wyoming, with fewer than 600,000: one vote. I imagined a fiercely divided and partisan Congress doing whatever it took to deny election to the Democratic challenger.

That was fiction—now on to reality.

Passionate opposition to an election outcome has never been higher. As Al Gore’s Transition Director, I suffered through the bitter 2000 election, the recount, and the painful court challenges. The rancor in the wake of Trump’s election has taken this bitterness to a much higher level, among both Democrats and establishment Republicans.

In spite of all this it is highly unlikely that 37 electors will abandon Trump this week. Nonetheless, a new spark has been lit under the fledgling movement to abolish the Electoral College as an undemocratic artifact of our Constitution. Even Donald Trump, believing in 2012 that Romney would win the popular vote, called the Electoral College a “disaster for democracy.” He has, of course,

changed his tune, tweeting after the election: “The Electoral College is actually genius in that it brings all states, including the smaller ones, into play.’”

Anonymous ID: f10a85 Dec. 15, 2020, 6 a.m. No.12036762   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6787 >>6838 >>6981

>>12036639

>ach state would receive one vote. California, with 38 million citizens: one vote. Wyoming, with fewer than 600,000: one vote.

 

Steve B has had this as the plan since election day

 

https://theconversation.com/how-congress-could-decide-the-2020-election-146054

 

How Congress could decide the 2020 election

October 9, 2020 8.30am EDT

 

Here’s why: In a concession to small states concerned their voices would be marginalized if the House was called upon to choose the president,the founders gave only one vote to each state. House delegations from each state meet to decide how to cast their single vote.

 

That voting procedure gives equal representation to California – population 40 million – and Wyoming, population 600,000.

 

Currently, this arrangement favors the Republicans. The GOP dominates the delegations from 26 states – exactly the number required to reach a majority under the rules of House presidential selection. But it’s not the current House that would decide a contested 2020 election. It is the newly elected House that would choose the president. So the outcome depends on congressional races.

 

One more caveat: Split decisions are considered abstentions, so states that cannot reach an agreement would be counted out.

Anonymous ID: f10a85 Dec. 15, 2020, 6:05 a.m. No.12036838   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12036639

>>12036762

well that's embarrassing

fake news from Dec 4

 

>But there is a problem for any scenario whereby Pence, or for that matter the Congress as a whole, might put aside the winning slate: There won’t be an alternative slate of electors pledged to Trump that could be substituted.That wasn’t the case in 1877, when competing authorities in four states sent competing lists of electors pledged to Republican Rutherford Hayes and Democrat Samuel Tilden. And that’s why the elaborate system for debating and certifying electors in Congress was set up in the Electoral Count Act.

 

https://archive.vn/uNx7u#selection-1287.293-1291.92