Anonymous ID: d69d95 Dec. 16, 2020, 6:05 a.m. No.12050579   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0664

>>12050292

WTF is this shit?

 

comms bakers need to keep shitting up the bread with more and more crap? Baker I know you just probably copied it here from the last guy, but I wish you could clear this bullshit out.

 

Notables section needs to be CLEAN, and hopefully BRIEF. No need to write a fucking book.

Anonymous ID: d69d95 Dec. 16, 2020, 6:20 a.m. No.12050729   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0888

>>12050634

 

What do you mean why are they posting it? As protest against your changing the fucking banner, moran. Your bullshit disclaimer is invented by yourselves, and we all know it. You want to fuck with things because it pleases you to do so, and you are not here to meaningfully contribute.

 

So if you want to be triggered by teh ACTUAL Qresearch flag banner, then fine, be triggered. It is fair payback for the amoung of triggering that your banner fuckery is causing REAL ANONS. This is how we cope.

 

So cope, you fucking turd. If the words QAnon were all that bothered you, then you could easily use the QResearch version of the banner, while keeping the rest of it. Right? I doubt you would get any complaints from us. But nope, you have to use that fucking GLOBOHOMO gold fringy flag, just coz you like to be assholes.

 

/rant

 

reeeeeeee more you motherfuckers

Anonymous ID: d69d95 Dec. 16, 2020, 6:34 a.m. No.12050871   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0896

>>12050835

>And yet here we are without your banner still.

>You lost.

>Time to move on little girl.

 

One of the rare admissions that it was a coordinated takeover. You seem to have gone off script.

 

Love the fact that the correct banner triggers you so, however. We will see who loses in the end.

Anonymous ID: d69d95 Dec. 16, 2020, 6:37 a.m. No.12050923   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>12050664

If true, thats just fucking sad.

 

It's the baker's kitchen. That said, I feel like the baker should respect the banner and at least the format of what came before. But this new section has JUST been added, like since yesterday. I think you'd be justified in resisting it.

 

Those complaining will be the comms fags, who are enemies at this point.

Anonymous ID: d69d95 Dec. 16, 2020, 6:58 a.m. No.12051131   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1138

>>12051000

A few days ago there was some theorizing about if the 'first recipient' whole media show was just a fake narrative. Any update on that? It was the only thing making sense to me so far, because I can't wrap my head around Trump = vax either.