>>12058180 pb
Pretty much figured they'd disobey DJT
They always do
He speaks a language they want to oppose.
Crooked crooks
No I think he can arrest the head of the DNI who is blocking it
Is that dude taking money from China too?
DNI can just go ahead without the "senior intel officials"
Those were the ones who screwed DJT for three years, got away with it and kept their jobs.
So they need to be arrested anyway.
Nobody 's going to arrest themselves?
Hawley's the one who will stand up when the time comes to question the electors;
Won't it be worse for the perps when the connection with China is revealed after DJT is sworn in one more time?
qresear.ch
what if DNI comes out and says "no problem with the election"
Better if they don't put out their report?
We already have everything?
They are disobeying the President
We already know that
MAYBE Ratcliffe wants the honest report and the others push the sanitized version?
>>12058053 pb
so it will just be released without their input. They can write their own report, as they did throughout the Russiagate Hoax
Wonder if they are paid by China or by Awan, or is it Soros? or HSBC or Vatican. or Money laundry through Art
They should all be investigated.