>>12063868 lb/pb 2018 Election [Playbook Known]

Read this, Anon:

"Why did the same counties [under dispute today] REFUSE to turn over voter registration information upon request to the Voter Fraud Commission?

Why was the Voter Fraud Commission disbanded and turned over to DHS?

What vested auth does DHS have compared to a commission body?"

Understand?

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.453 📁

Nov 11 2018 13:36:43 (EST)

WHAT IF THE BELOW COULD BE PROVEN?

1-Election + D party officials filled out many thousands of blank ballots?

2-Election + D party officials removed and destroyed 'legal' ballots?

3-Election + D party officials deliberately organized non-citizen voting?

4-Election + D party officials in [XX] locations across the US [under lock & key] stored many thousands of 'blank' ballots for purposes of 'altering the vote total'?

Who safeguards 'blank' ballots?

Who issues 'blank' ballots?

Who controls 'blank' ballots?

How many 'blank' ballots are generated vs. total county pop?

THE CONTROL AND ISSUANCE OF BLANK BALLOTS IS KEY.

Why did the same counties [under dispute today] REFUSE to turn over voter registration information upon request to the Voter Fraud Commission?

Why was the Voter Fraud Commission disbanded and turned over to DHS?

What vested auth does DHS have compared to a commission body?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/without-evidence-trump-and-sessions-warn-of-voter-fraud-in-tuesdays-elections/2018/11/05/e9564788-e115-11e8-8f5f-a55347f48762_story.html?utm_term=.db84f6960764📁

Enemy @ the Front Door.

Q

>>12064685

'We', the American People, were not in control then, OldAnon. Our government was infiltrated. [They] ran our country to benefit themselves.

[They] conducted a hostile takeover that subverted our culture, and destroyed social values by using mass media, movies, promotion of deviant conduct, our education system, and even our history books.

This is what, and why, we fight. After being burrowed in like ticks all our lives they are are only now looking up, and around. More are catching on and sticking their heads up every day. It's much too late for them to scatter.

>>12064696

>We will see in the next two weeks whether Trump prevails,

I agree with your assessment, Anon. Patriots have been very patient, but are like a compressed spring.

It's not just Trump, though. This operation is more than just him. He has done a fine job as a diversion and the enemy has focused on him as the plan required.

>>12064812

>>12064812

>What vested auth does DHS have compared to a commission body?

40 U.S. Code § 1315. Law enforcement authority of Secretary of Homeland Security for protection of public property

(2) Powers.—While engaged in the performance of official duties, an officer or agent designated under this subsection may—

(A) enforce Federal laws and regulations for the protection of persons and property;

(B) carry firearms;

(C) make arrests without a warrant for any offense against the United States committed in the presence of the officer or agent or for any felony cognizable under the laws of the United States if the officer or agent has reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed or is committing a felony;

(D) serve warrants and subpoenas issued under the authority of the United States;

(E) conduct investigations, on and off the property in question, of offenses that may have been committed against property owned or occupied by the Federal Government or persons on the property; and

(F) carry out such other activities for the promotion of homeland security as the Secretary may prescribe.

>>12064793

Bless you, DHSAnon. Difficult truths:

"Crimes against children unite all humanity [cross party lines]?

Difficult truths.

Q"

Anons favorite 'DHS' drop (https://qanon.pub/?q=dhs):

While this report only encompasses a sampling of twenty-two (22) counties across the U.S., it is strongly suggested, based on the evidence provided, that a mandated countrywide investigation begin under the recommended US50-EIC guidelines as set forth in Section VII of the final report. Furthermore, based on our immediate findings, we recommend the adoption of 8(E)(F)(G)(H) be made immediately to combat sources & methods currently being deployed to …………………………..

The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.

>>12064943

'And, by the way, about Greenland …'

>>12064961

>>12064961

>Trump named Roberts chief Justice

Take another look at this, Anon. It's inaccurate.

>>12064964

>>12064964

Do you believe you are witnessing a military operation, Anon?

>>12064921

From Q:

"How many Marines volunteered to serve Hussein during his term?

Why?"

>>12064984

>>12064984

Were you around for the sonic booms and falling space debris back when this started?

>>12064995

>>12064995

And the media thought this was about Trump 'blocking his critics'. Fools. 17 steps ahead.

Too bad he lost on appeal. This was brilliant.

"The Department of Justice on Monday told a federal district court judge In Washington, D.C. that Donald Trump’s tweets are “official statements of the President of the United States.”

As the National Law Journal reports, the assertion that the tweets are official government statements was made in James Madison Project v. Department of Justice"

https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/government_says_trumps_tweets_are_official_presidential_statements

The White House asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to reverse a lower court ruling that said President Donald Trump’s practice of blocking critics on Twitter ran afoul of the Constitution’s First Amendment.

The request to the high court renews a debate about the nature of the president’s use of social media.

A federal appeals court ruled last year that the president used his account as “an official channel of communication.” On that basis, the unanimous three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Trump has effectively created a public forum, and was forbidden from blocking users based on their political views.

The full appeals court declined to revisit that decision in March.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/20/white-house-asks-supreme-court-to-let-trump-block-critics-on-twitter.html

>>12065156

Good realization, Anon.

" The section allows the use of military undercover agents and the collection of intelligence concerning civilian activities…"

https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/p/posse-comitatus-act-and-related-matters-a-sketch.html

The Posse Comitatus Act does not apply where Congress has expressly authorized use of the military to execute the law. Congress has done so in three ways, by giving a branch of the armed forces civilian law enforcement authority, by establishing general rules for certain types of assistance, and by addressing individual cases and circumstances with more narrowly crafted legislation. Thus it has vested the Coast Guard, a branch of the armed forces, with broad law enforcement responsibilities. Second, over the years it has passed a fairly extensive array of particularized statutes, like those permitting the President to call out the armed forces in times of insurrection and domestic violence, 10 U.S.C. §§ 331-335. Finally, it has enacted general legislation authorizing the armed forces to share information and equipment with civilian law enforcement agencies, 10 U.S.C. §§ 371-382.

The legislation contains both explicit grants of authority and restrictions on the use of that authority for military assistance to the police federal, state and local particularly in the form of information and equipment, 10 U.S.C. §§ 371-382. Section 371 specifically authorizes the armed forces to share information acquired during military operations and in fact encourages the armed forces to plan their activities with an eye to the production of incidental civilian benefits. The section allows the use of military undercover agents and the collection of intelligence concerning civilian activities only where there is a nexus to an underlying military purpose. Under sections 372 through 374, military equipment and facilities may be made available to civilian authorities; members of the armed forces may train civilian police on the operation and maintenance of equipment and may provide them with expert advice; and military personnel may be employed to maintain and operate the equipment supplied.

>>12065203

>This is about breaking the public's hypnotic spell

Like, an awakening?

>>12065283

Anons were here when the space-based threats were removed. Plus this:

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 089200 No.4280699 📁

Dec 12 2018 18:54:13 (EST)

Anonymous ID: 5c3172 No.4280617 📁

Dec 12 2018 18:52:39 (EST)

Q - Should we be prepping for some kind of shutdown?

>>4280617

No.

Reports of 'power grid' attacks (6 mo prep) should be disregarded.

While attacks do occur, we are safeguarded by a 'Black Eye'.

Q