Anonymous ID: f20f07 Dec. 17, 2020, 8:52 a.m. No.12066389   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6483 >>6742 >>6886

I watched this yesterday, Seattle is screwed. If you want a roadmap on how to destroy America, Seattle is it!

 

https://pjmedia.com/culture/victoria-taft/2020/12/17/the-fight-for-the-soul-of-seattle-documentary-rips-off-progressive-scab-to-reveal-the-left-is-killing-the-emerald-city-n1215724

 

KOMO reporter and new host Eric Johnson skillfully weaves the data points, most of which have been chronicled by PJ Media, into a 90 minute show-and-tell of the lawlessness planned and executed by city council members, homeless advocates, and lawyers groups all in the name of “compassion.”

Anonymous ID: f20f07 Dec. 17, 2020, 9:18 a.m. No.12066725   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6742 >>6886

America and Russia co-operating is a threat to whom ?

 

https://www.rt.com/op-ed/509990-deep-state-biden-russia/

 

The purportedly hacked US software, SolarWinds, is used widely across government departments and agencies (how’s that for a security no-no!), and from the above assertion of “fact” that Russia was behind the cyber intrusion, then it follows – but only by implication – that all of the said US departments and agencies have been breached.

 

On Monday, the NY Times headlined: “Scope of Russia Hack Becomes Clear: Multiple US Agencies Were Hit.”

 

Well, it’s not at all “clear” because no evidence is provided. And the multiple agencies, which the newspaper implies might be affected, actually declined to give any comment, including the Pentagon, the Department of Homeland Security, National Security Agency and State Department.

 

“Investigators were struggling to determine the extent to which the military, intelligence community and nuclear laboratories were affected by the highly sophisticated attack,” reported the newspaper.

 

In other words, the Times is “struggling to determine” evidence to back up its story.

 

All we have, therefore, is lurid claim, assertion and innuendo, which is pretty-much par for the course of US journalism when it comes to demonizing Russia. In any case, serious journalism abiding by basic reporting standards is not the point. The point is to achieve perception. Perception of Russia as a very, very, bad, bad country that is out to ruin virtuous America.

 

But it was left to the NY Times, the unofficial media organ of the CIA and other deep-state operatives, to follow up with the gaslighting.

 

The day after “reporting” the “scope of Russia hack,” the Times ran its instruction for President-elect Joe Biden under the guise of a “news analysis” piece. The headline was: “Biden to Face a Confrontational Russia in a World Changed From His Time in Office”.

 

It went on to say: “The president-elect will have to assure American national security in ways that will require pushing back on the Kremlin at times and, at others, seeking Russian cooperation.”

 

Forget the appended sop about “Russian cooperation.” The thrust of the article was telling the incoming Biden administration to adopt a more “unified” policy towards Russia, which ends “the era of bifurcation between the West Wing and the American national security establishment.”

Anonymous ID: f20f07 Dec. 17, 2020, 9:27 a.m. No.12066824   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6886

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2020/12/17/did-a-communist-spy-know-that-rep-swalwell-was-being-appointed-to-intel-committee-n1216716

 

Swalwell says he met Ms. Fang in 2012. She worked as a fundraiser on his 2014 re-election campaign. And that’s when the fun begins.

 

Fang apparently had enough sway with Swalwell to name an intern to his Washington office. But the vital issue is when? The FBI says they briefed Swalwell on Fang’s possible ties to Chinese intelligence sometime around 2015. Swalwell was appointed to the intelligence committee in early January of that year. Speaker Pelosi says she and other congressional leaders were briefed on Fang in the spring of 2015.

 

Apparently, for a few months, Swalwell knew he may have been compromised but neglected to inform the Speaker of the House.

 

The first question we should be asking is how a backbench Democrat not only managed to wangle a plum assignment to the intelligence committee but what possessed Speaker Pelosi to name him the ranking Democrat on the CIA oversight subcommittee?

 

At the time he was appointed to those prestigious posts, Swalwell had been in Congress for one term. It must have raised some eyebrows in the Democratic caucus at the time when this rookie got such choice postings.

Anonymous ID: f20f07 Dec. 17, 2020, 9:38 a.m. No.12066971   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>12066914

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/dominion-lawyers-send-scathing-letter-to-ex-trump-lawyer-demanding-she-retract-lies

 

And yet they wont bring a lawsuit, why is that Media Matters