>>12078549 (pb)
on the statement "Garden's typically arn't under water…"
Ringo might disagree.
"I'd like to be. . . .
under the sea
in an Octopus's garden
in the shade"
sauce on your dogma 'chosen before . . .' because I never heard that one before. And I think Mary is awesome!
sauce it or you are making it up.
you keep doing this post, as if all bad horrible ideas came from Romans, when, in fact, Romans created the mythos that they thought would tame the horror.
because it wasn't them who had the myth of 'son of gawd'.
they ran with it to do the job of ruling.
if they hadn't used the myth it would have been used to take them all down.
and the obcession with 'blaming Romans' is a bit much, and shows you as a divider.
learning History means rejecting propaganda like what yo put out. With no love in your heart you can't understand the Love that Moves the Sun and other Stars.
Catholics pray with Mary.
And they ask her for prayers.
It's a wise thing to do if you believe.
and if you don't believe, then why are you obcessed with her?
explain why that would be true.
and if it were why do you have license to be the accuser?
your 'indictment' against me is really on your head, about your behavior.
it was a way for deep state investor pension funds to loot IP budgets, too.
how many of the 'apocypral' books are just modern fakes designed to weaken dogmas by providing false scriptures.
seems like the cabal is working that angle,
vatacan (run by them now) colluding with 'iranian cleric' experts in 'ancient texts' that no noe ever heard about. why would muslim Iranians have an ambassador tot he Vatican 'expert' in such texts?
sounded fishy to me.
point to point wireless IP on wave guides out of the path of people.
screw the sat-link BS.
History tells a different story.
the Jews were captive in Rome.
why did they bring them to Rome?
because in reality they liked them.
As a matter of fact they didn't really want to destroy the temple, it was a money maker.
Learn History. The Jews were brought to Rome.
As Slaves at first. But Romans like to free slaves so after a time they were.
and also: they are still in Rome too.
so your narrative is fake.
the cope-dope
you're a bain, you bring nothing.
all you do is imagine some distress and shame-boast.
there is no such distress. your 'cope' shill is futile and tags you as an annoyance shill.
it was known by Cathlics in the mid 1800s that the ignorance of History was the big flaw in Protastanism.
If you believe in an immortal soul, and saints in Heaven, why would you then say 'everything that happened after AD 70 is of no value and we will learn no names or stories of anyone from that time till Martin Luther?
it's a shameful neglect of holy ancestors!