>>12098606 (/lb)
How is the credibility of ANY source other than me better then my own credibility?
Since when did the thoughts and ideas of an individual become absolutely worthless to the point of threatening bakers who as individuals decide that they think it's credible.
Who are you and who is any other source to say they're more credible than one person's views?
If the FBI said Trump colluded with Russia, and oh look at all their 'sources'…is their narrative more 'credible' than say one person who thinks Trump didn't collude with Russia?
The is such a thing as recognizing true statements that are 'sauceless'.
Now I am not calling for any replacement strat that welcomes more sauceless posts, but let's not be a fucking sauce Nazi as the only possible conceivable way of having 'standing' in saying what's true.
It's true that legally Trump won the election.
You demand a source for that?
It's still true whether I provide a sauce or not.
Feel free to disagree, it won't change the fact that it's a true statement that Trump won the election legally and Biden 'won' it illegally.
I know the truth