>1 & 1 don't equal 2.
Previous bread pointed out 1 & 1 is bitwise math, so 1 & 1 = 1.
Q doesn't make horrible grammatical errors. He used don't instead of doesn't.
This is pointing to logic
>1 & 1 don't equal 2.
Previous bread pointed out 1 & 1 is bitwise math, so 1 & 1 = 1.
Q doesn't make horrible grammatical errors. He used don't instead of doesn't.
This is pointing to logic
That's what I'm thinking. We have to figure out how both articles can be true