>>12207611

>Profit is ordained by nature

Why is it so difficult to understand that interest exists outside of nature?

Finance should NOT be an industry. You're not talking about lending coin, you're talking about lending corn because exactly what i'm saying is infallible.

If there is less coin in circulation than is due to be paid back, that is inequity. Someone will not have the coin to pay back the loan. That margin of difference is formed by interest. Money should not be an industry. It was created as a placeholder of value, not value itself. There is no value in intangibles. You can't hold them, you can't see them, but for some reason you are all convinced there is some mystical value in it because a big building exists and a bunch of men employ people to lend out "nothing"

How is this hard?

It's not even arguable. There is no argument against it. Even what you're trying to put forth here doesn't even cover what I'm talking about. You're talking about commodities trying to give an argument based on the asset while I'm talking about the interest attached to the asset. They're 2 different things. Any form of interest on an asset creates a thing that is NOT the asset, it is a fiction. A fairy-tail that requires you to pay back a sum of your real asset for that very fairy-tale.

You have 100 barrels of corn, you get 100 barrels of corn worth of coin. in bizarro world, you somehow have convinced yourself that you should be able to get 150 barrels of corn worth of coin for your 100 barrels of corn because you're creating a fiction market. NO. your corn will be worth 100 barrels of corn regardless of the fiction you try to attach to it and you will find that out when you go to pay back your fiction with your real asset that doesn't exist until you run out of assets because you are paying back a fiction and you can never pay back an imaginary fiction because it doesn't exist.

>>12207595

>it marks you as 'unqualified' for being in leadership roles.

I don't want anything to do with a leadership role

I'm an anonymous poster on a japanese image board.

>>12207587

To me, you're an ape arguing the case for the cage.

I'm outside the cage trying to tell you you're in a cage and you're arguing why you're not.

>>12207752

>false platitude

There is nothing false about what I'm trying to get people to recognize.

Every single ailment of society can be traced back to interest. Every war on earth is due to debt. Wars are bankers form of debt collection. When you're a local loanshark, how do you collect? You send "muscle"

America is bankrupt. The bankers are calling for war. We are here because of interest. Everything that we are witnessing is due to interest on currency.

The world is a giant ponzi scheme and it is disheartening to see people still arguing in favor of the ponzi scheme. I'm just stunned at how it's not glaringly obvious to people?

Forget about money.

Lets say you wanted to buy my car. How much would I sell you my car for in corn?

Well, I would charge you a cars worth of corn, of course.

"But, I don't have the corn right now, I can pay you over time."

That doesn't change anything, I still charge you a cars worth of corn so long as nobody else is willing to pay me today for my car. We form an agreement and I eventually get my cars worth of corn.

this is logical. This is real. This is how a sane world functions. However, when "coin" is entered into it, suddenly people are convinced that somehow, their car is worth less than a cars worth of coin. That is insane. Why would a car ever be worth less than a cars worth of coin?

Here is is….

INTEREST!

>>12207774

AI in the courts would be a civilization changing advancement. No bias, just textbook judging and sentencing.

"Do this, get this"

no jury selection

no judges to corrupt

every human held to the same rulings.

It would absolutely change history.

>>12207827

I have to assume you're trolling me now. If so, good on ya. You got me.

>>12207864

^^^

look everyone, it's the muh-joo shill pushing violence

>>12207892

>ethics and/or morality

Your understanding of AI is off.

Computers have no capacity for anything other than rote process.

There is no morality

At best, they can return a score based upon a model.

>>12207913

We're here:

We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are … endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights…. That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men…. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. … Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. Declaration of Independence (1776).

>>12207865

any guesses on what this could point to?

could this be a breakup of the Catholic Church?

>>12207950

Another thing you would do is take down their satellites, cutting off communications with the insurgency, then monitor all the comms traffic in and out of the US before moving into total removal of the parasite.

Once they are removed, the unification of the people can begin.

America has the military strength to hold off the rest of the world. Couple in our allies and the amount of countries citizens who would simply refuse to go to war against us, we're in for a rough road, but the map has been laid out in the best possible scenario for what's to come.

>>12207977

Do you think they could be consolidating their assets with others to form a stronger resistance?

>>12208034

Honest question, codebros

Am I stupid for this having taken me 3 hours to figure out?

def fibFinder(low_number, high_number, total_calcs):

stored_value = [low_number]

for _ in range(total_calcs):

stored_value.append(low_number + high_number)

stored_value.append(stored_value[-1] + stored_value[-2])

return stored_value

for pic related

I feel like I should have been able to do that in 10 minutes and I fucking struggled on it for 3 hours but I have no basis for comparison as I've never been in a classroom or worked with other coders.

>>12208164

and yes, I'm adding this in to solve the F(0) and F(1) issue

if n 0 or n 1:

return 1

else:

>>12208195

I have no idea if I should be looking for work since I "CAN" solve intermediate/advanced coding problems or if I should not be because I'm not solving them quickly.